A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Anatomical comparison of minimally invasive nasal valve procedures. | LitMetric

Anatomical comparison of minimally invasive nasal valve procedures.

Arch Facial Plast Surg

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.

Published: December 2012

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare the effects of Z-plasty and spreader grafts on the nasal valve surface area using cadaver samples.
  • The results indicated that Z-plasty led to a 65% average increase in nasal valve surface area, significantly more than the 31% increase observed with spreader grafts.
  • Both techniques improved nasal airflow, but Z-plasty was more effective in increasing the surface area of the nasal valve.

Article Abstract

Objective: To determine the quantitative effects of Z-plasty vs spreader grafts on nasal valve surface area.

Methods: Eight fresh cadaver heads were used that provided 16 total nasal valve procedures. Surgical sides were randomized, and Z-plasty was performed on 8 valves and endonasal spreader grafts were performed on 8 valves. The minimal cross-sectional area at the level of the nasal valve was measured preoperatively and postoperatively using acoustic rhinometry. We then compared Z-plasty and spreader grafts using a Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Results: The mean nasal surface area at the nasal valve before Z-plasty was 1.37 cm(2) (range, 0.39-2.25 cm(2)) and after Z-plasty was 1.95 cm(2) (range, 1.08-2.62 cm(2)). The mean surface area at the nasal valve before spreader grafts was 1.15 cm(2) (range, 0.75-1.48 cm(2)) and after spreader grafts was 1.48 cm(2) (0.95-1.95 cm(2)). This correlates with a mean increase in the nasal valve surface area of 65% when Z-plasty was performed (95% CI, 28%-88%; P = .007) and 31% when a spreader graft was performed (95% CI, 15%-54%; P = .01).

Conclusions: Z-plasty and spreader grafts were shown to increase nasal valve surface area. Z-plasty seems to increase nasal valve surface area more than spreader grafts.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archfacial.2012.24DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nasal valve
36
spreader grafts
28
surface area
20
valve surface
16
z-plasty spreader
12
cm2 range
12
increase nasal
12
nasal
10
valve
9
valve procedures
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!