AI Article Synopsis

  • New spectral-domain OCT devices show higher retinal thickness values compared to older time-domain OCTs, prompting a study to compare manual measurements between the two technologies.
  • Six eyes were analyzed using Stratus and Cirrus OCT devices, measuring retinal thickness at various points and assessing the reproducibility of these measurements using statistical methods like ICC and Bland-Altman plots.
  • Results indicated significant differences in retinal thickness values between Stratus and Cirrus measurements, but high reproducibility was found within the manual measurements, suggesting they can be used interchangeably for comparisons.

Article Abstract

Background And Aim Of The Work: retinal thickness values obtained by automated analysis with new spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices exceed those measured by old time-domain OCTs. Aim of the present work is to assess reproducibility and comparability of manual measurements performed on both time-domain and spectral-domain OCT scans.

Methods: 6 eyes were scanned using Stratus OCT3 and Cirrus hd-OCT. Raw exported images were analyzed by ordinary computer software; multiple manual measurements of retinal thickness were taken at different eccentricities. Stratus Retinal Thickness (SRT) was measured from Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM) to the photoreceptors Internal-Outer Segment interface (IS/OS), while two series of measurements were performed in Cirrus images: CRT = Cirrus-RT (from ILM to the Retinal Pigment Epitelium, RPE) and cCRT = corrected-CRT (from ILM to IS/OS). Measurements were repeated twice in two eyes and reproducibility was assessed by Intra-Class correlation (ICC) and Coefficient of Variation (CV). Bland-Altman plots, paired t-test and ICC were used for comparative analysis between Stratus and Cirrus measurements.

Results: Mean SRT, CRT and cCRT values +/- SD were respectively 244.75 +/- 34.78 microm, 275.78 +/- 34.36 microm and 244.95 +/- 33.78 microm. Paired t-test resulted in p<0.0001 comparing SRT and CRT series, versus p=0.6544 between SRT and cCRT series. ICC was 0.65 between SRT and CRT and 0,94 between SRT-cCRT. Reproducibility of the measurements was excellent (CV=2,13% for Stratus and 1,62% for Cirrus; ICC=0,994 for both devices).

Discussion: while a systematic error affects comparison of Stratus and Cirrus macular thickness maps, manual linear measurements result interchangeable, hence allowing comparison of images acquired with either OCT systems. (www.actabiomedica.it).

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

retinal thickness
16
manual measurements
12
spectral-domain optical
8
optical coherence
8
coherence tomography
8
aim work
8
measurements performed
8
paired t-test
8
retinal
5
measurements
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!