AI Article Synopsis

  • Real-time shear wave elastography (SWE) is an innovative noninvasive technique used to evaluate liver fibrosis by assessing liver stiffness, particularly in patients with chronic hepatitis C.
  • A study involving 121 patients compared the accuracy of SWE with transient elastography (TE), using liver biopsy as the standard reference, revealing that SWE showed higher accuracy for detecting significant fibrosis (≥ F2) compared to TE.
  • The results indicated that SWE not only had a better area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) than TE for assessing liver fibrosis but also provided real-time imaging advantages, allowing for targeted measurements based on both anatomy and tissue stiffness.

Article Abstract

Unlabelled: Real-time shear wave elastography (SWE) is a novel, noninvasive method to assess liver fibrosis by measuring liver stiffness. This single-center study was conducted to assess the accuracy of SWE in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC), in comparison with transient elastography (TE), by using liver biopsy (LB) as the reference standard. Consecutive patients with CHC scheduled for LB by referring physicians were studied. One hundred and twenty-one patients met inclusion criteria. On the same day, real-time SWE using the ultrasound (US) system, Aixplorer (SuperSonic Imagine S.A., Aix-en-Provence, France), TE using FibroScan (Echosens, Paris, France), and US-assisted LB were consecutively performed. Fibrosis was staged according to the METAVIR scoring system. Analyses of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were performed to calculate optimal area under the ROC curve (AUROC) for F0-F1 versus F2-F4, F0- F2 versus F3-F4, and F0-F3 versus F4 for both real-time SWE and TE. Liver stiffness values increased in parallel with degree of liver fibrosis, both with SWE and TE. AUROCs were 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-0.96) for SWE and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.76-0.90) for TE (P = 0.002), 0.98 (95% CI: 0.94-1.00) for SWE and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.90-0.99) for TE (P = 0.14), and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.93-1.00) for SWE and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.91-0.99) for TE (P = 0.48), when comparing F0-F1 versus F2- F4, F0- F2 versus F3-F4, and F0 -F3 versus F4, respectively.

Conclusion: The results of this study show that real-time SWE is more accurate than TE in assessing significant fibrosis (≥ F2). With respect to TE, SWE has the advantage of imaging liver stiffness in real time while guided by a B-mode image. Thus, the region of measurement can be guided with both anatomical and tissue stiffness information.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.25936DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

liver fibrosis
12
liver stiffness
12
real-time swe
12
swe
10
real-time shear
8
shear wave
8
wave elastography
8
chronic hepatitis
8
roc curve
8
f0-f1 versus
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!