AI Article Synopsis

  • Existing saliva sampling methods fail to effectively capture the physical-chemical properties of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), prompting a new approach using a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) sampler for in situ sampling directly from the mouth.
  • In vitro results show that lower vapour pressure VOCs yield higher recovery rates and more consistent results compared to higher vapour pressure compounds, indicating the importance of analyte properties in sampling efficiency.
  • The study suggests a 10-minute sampling window balances recovery and variability, outperforming traditional passive drool methods, and highlights potential for customizable sampling techniques for better analysis of human volatile signatures.

Article Abstract

Evaluation of published methods reveals that existing methods for saliva sampling do not address the physical-chemical attributes of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). This study describes and presents evidence for adopting in situ sampling of salivary VOCs directly from the oral cavity using a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) based sampler. In vitro studies indicated that the vapour pressure of analytes was a factor in both the recovery of analytes and the precision of the recovery. The highest recoveries were observed for VOCs with the lowest vapour pressures, for example 5-nonanol (vapour pressure (P(v)) = 14 Pa) recoveries were approximately 20 times greater than those observed for octane (P(v) = 1726 Pa). Similarly, relative standard deviations reduced with vapour pressure, with the RSD for 5-nonanol responses observed to be 2.7% when compared to RSD = 26% for octane. Evaluation of VOCs recovered from 6 in vivo samples indicated that VOC concentrations in saliva may follow log-normal distributions; log-normal RSDs falling between 4.4% and 18.2% across the range of volatilities encountered. Increasing sampling time from 1 to 30 minutes indicated that the recovery of VOC into the sampler was affected by interaction between different physical-chemical properties and biogenic flux. A sampling time of 10 min was found to offer an acceptable compromise that enabled a representative sample to be acquired for the widest range of observed VOC behaviours with the sampler. The potential to 'tune' the sampling protocol for targeted analysis based on these factors was also noted. Comparison with passive drool saliva collection revealed up to 10(5) enhancement with reduced variability compared to drooled samples. This approach to in situ saliva sampling appears to have significant analytical utility for studying volatile signatures in humans.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2an35432bDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vapour pressure
12
volatile organic
8
oral cavity
8
saliva sampling
8
sampling time
8
sampling
7
saliva
5
sampling characterisation
4
characterisation volatile
4
organic compound
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!