Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: To analyze whether the cleavage pattern redefined for all cleavage stages according to the relative blastomere size as a function of cell number has an additive value in predicting implantation potential of day-2 and day-3 embryos.
Design: Retrospective analysis of standard embryo morphologic parameters (cleavage rate and degree of fragmentation) supplemented by cleavage pattern findings of 347 implanted embryos compared with those of a matched control group of 307 embryos that failed to implant.
Setting: University-based tertiary medical center.
Patient(s): Two hundred and nine women with successful implantation and 181 controls matched for age and demographic parameters with failed implantation.
Intervention(s): In vitro fertilization (IVF), embryo assessment, and embryo transfer.
Main Outcome Measure(s): Determination of cleavage patterns in synchronized and unsynchronized cleaving embryos and correlations with implantation outcomes.
Result(s): Statistically significantly more embryos of the implanted group had good cleavage patterns compared with the failed implantation group (88% vs. 70%). A good cleavage pattern predicted implantation outcome even for nonsynchronized cleaving blastomeres at three, five, six, and seven cells (79% vs. 59%). Regression analysis demonstrated that adding cleavage pattern to the scoring system increased our ability to predict implantation in the training set; the area under the curve was the highest (0.707) as was the proportion of correct classification (>70%) when the cleavage pattern was assessed on both days 2 and 3.
Conclusion(s): When combined with measurements of the cleavage rate and degree of fragmentation, the cleavage pattern refines our ability to predict the likelihood of implantation, representing a definitive tool in the selection of top-quality embryos.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.041 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!