A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of two ready-to-use systems designed for sperm-hyaluronic acid binding selection before intracytoplasmic sperm injection: PICSI vs. Sperm Slow: a prospective, randomized trial. | LitMetric

Objective: To compare, in a strict, randomized way, the efficiency of two ready-to-use systems for hyaluronic acid (HA)-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI): an HA culture dish (PICSI Sperm Selection Device) and a viscous medium containing HA (Sperm Slow).

Design: Prospective, randomized study.

Setting: Medical center.

Patient(s): Fifty subjects per treatment group (100 total).

Intervention(s): One hundred ICSI treatments were randomly carried out with PICSI or with Sperm Slow for sperm selection. Randomization was conducted with sealed envelopes. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection was performed by a single embryologist with 5 years' experience in HA-ICSI.

Primary Outcome Measure: good-quality embryo rate.

Secondary Outcome Measures: oocyte fertilization, pregnancy and implantation rate, and the duration of the ICSI procedure.

Result(s): The good-quality embryo rate was comparable between the two groups (58.5% with PICSI vs. 56% with Sperm Slow). Overall there were no statistically significant differences in secondary outcome measures except ICSI procedure duration, which was 3 minutes longer in the PICSI group.

Conclusion(s): Both PICSI and Sperm Slow allow comparable clinical efficiency in selecting HA-bound spermatozoa.

Clinical Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN72668039.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.043DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

picsi sperm
16
sperm slow
16
sperm injection
12
sperm
10
ready-to-use systems
8
intracytoplasmic sperm
8
prospective randomized
8
sperm selection
8
good-quality embryo
8
outcome measures
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!