A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Impact of BVDV infection of white-tailed deer during second and third trimesters of pregnancy. | LitMetric

Impact of BVDV infection of white-tailed deer during second and third trimesters of pregnancy.

J Wildl Dis

Ruminant Diseases and Immunology Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, USDA Agricultural Research Service, 1920 Dayton Avenue, PO Box 70, Ames, Iowa 50010, USA.

Published: July 2012

AI Article Synopsis

  • Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) can cause significant effects on pregnant white-tailed deer, depending on the stage of pregnancy during infection.
  • Infections during the second trimester led to pregnancy loss in 3 out of 5 deer, while the fawns born to the unaffected deer were healthy and negative for BVDV.
  • Infections in the third trimester did not affect the pregnancy, resulting in all does giving birth to healthy, BVDV-negative fawns, indicating that the impact of BVDV on pregnant white-tailed deer resembles its effects on pregnant cattle.

Article Abstract

While it has been demonstrated that persistent bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) infections can be established in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) following in utero exposure in the first trimester of gestation, there is little to no information regarding the outcome of infection in later stages of pregnancy in deer. Our goal was to observe the impact of infection of white-tailed deer in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Five white-tailed deer in the second trimester of pregnancy and four in the third trimester were infected with a BVDV type 2 virus previously isolated from a BVDV-infected deer harvested from the wild. Infection of deer in the second trimester of pregnancy resulted in loss of the pregnancy in three of five deer. Fawns born to the two remaining deer appeared normal and were born BVDV antigen-negative with neutralizing serum antibodies against BVDV. Infection of does in the third trimester of pregnancy did not result in fetal death or persistent infection and all does gave birth to live, healthy fawns that were BVDV antigen-negative and born with antibodies against BVDV. These results, combined with those previously reported regarding BVDV infection in the first trimester of pregnancy, suggest that the impact of BVDV infection of pregnant white-tailed deer is very similar to that observed in pregnant cattle.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-48.3.758DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

white-tailed deer
20
bvdv infection
16
deer second
16
trimester pregnancy
16
deer
10
impact bvdv
8
infection
8
infection white-tailed
8
second third
8
third trimesters
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!