A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Biomechanical analysis of pinning configurations for a supracondylar humerus fracture with coronal medial obliquity. | LitMetric

Despite hundreds of studies of pinning configurations for transverse supracondylar humerus fractures, very few studies have investigated the optimal pin configurations in the treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures with coronal medial obliquity. The aim of this study was to develop a model of supracondylar humerus fractures with coronal medial obliquity and compare the stability of three various pin configurations to provide an acceptable pin placement. Oblique cuts were made in synthetic humeri at the level of the coronoid and olecranon fossae to simulate a humeral supracondylar fracture with coronal medial obliquity. Each fracture was reduced and fixed using two 0.062 inch K-wires in three different configurations, and sequentially tested in extension, varus, valgus, and internal and external rotations using an MTS 858 Minibionix materials testing load frame. We performed analysis of variance to compare construction stiffness of different pin configurations and the standard level of significant (P-value ≤ 0.05) was used indicate statistical significance. In resistance to extension and valgus loading, there was no statistical difference between all the three pin configurations (P=0.22 and 0.130, respectively). During the varus loading condition, the greatest stiffness values were obtained with the two crossed pin configuration, followed by the two medial pins, and the two lateral pin configuration showed the lowest values. For resistance in internal and external rotation testing, although there was no statistical difference between the two medial pins and the two crossed pins configurations (P=0.06 and 0.75, respectively), they were significantly greater than that of the two lateral pin configuration (P=0.003 and 0.004; P=0.001 and 0.02, respectively). In a synthetic humerus model of supracondylar humerus fractures with coronal medial obliquity, the two crossed pin configuration provided statistically greatest or comparable stability in the varus, and internal and external rotation loading conditions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0b013e328355d01fDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

supracondylar humerus
20
coronal medial
20
medial obliquity
20
humerus fractures
16
pin configurations
16
pin configuration
16
fractures coronal
12
internal external
12
pin
9
configurations
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!