Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e31825d2418 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Fingertip Wearables and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Is Event Level Precision the Key?
Sleep
January 2025
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University at Buffalo, NY, USA.
"Selective Neurectomy with Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface Surgery for Facial Synkinesis," by Gu et al.
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med
January 2025
Department of Facial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Center for Advanced Facial Plastic Surgery, Beverly Hills, California, USA.
Promoting breastfeeding in Singapore-a case study.
BMJ Nutr Prev Health
July 2024
National University of Singapore, Singapore.
The health and economic benefits of breastfeeding for mothers, infants and the broader community are well established; however, breastfeeding rates remain suboptimal in Singapore. This commentary reviews the journey Singapore, a high-income and well-resourced country, has taken over the past two decades to promote breastfeeding. We discuss where we are currently at, the measures implemented to achieve our targets and next steps ahead.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNutrition Users' Guides: RCTs Part 2 - structured guide for interpreting and applying study results from randomised controlled trials on therapy or prevention questions.
BMJ Nutr Prev Health
August 2024
Department of Nutrition, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
This article continues from a prior commentary on evaluating the risk of bias in randomised controlled trials addressing nutritional interventions. Having provided a synopsis of the risk of bias issues, we now address how to understand trial results, including the interpretation of best estimates of effect and the corresponding precision (eg, 95% CIs), as well as the applicability of the evidence to patients based on their unique circumstances (eg, patients' values and preferences when trading off potential desirable and undesirable health outcomes and indicators (eg, cholesterol), and the potential burden and cost of an intervention). Authors can express the estimates of effect for health outcomes and indicators in relative terms (relative risks, relative risk reductions, OR or HRs)-measures that are generally consistent across populations-and absolute terms (risk differences)-measures that are more intuitive to clinicians and patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!