Object: In this paper the authors' goal was to compare the accuracy of computer-navigated pedicle screw insertion with nonnavigated techniques in the published literature.
Methods: The authors performed a systematic literature review using the National Center for Biotechnology Information Database (PubMed/MEDLINE) using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms "Neuronavigation," "Therapy, computer assisted," and "Stereotaxic techniques," and the text word "pedicle." Included in the meta-analysis were randomized control trials or patient cohort series, all of which compared computer-navigated spine surgery (CNSS) and nonassisted pedicle screw insertions. The primary end point was pedicle perforation, while the secondary end points were operative time, blood loss, and complications.
Results: Twenty studies were included for analysis; of which there were 18 cohort studies and 2 randomized controlled trials published between 2000 and 2011. Foreign-language papers were translated. The total number of screws included was 8539 (4814 navigated and 3725 nonnavigated). The most common indications for surgery were degenerative disease, spinal deformity, myelopathy, tumor, and trauma. Navigational methods were primarily based on CT imaging. All regions of the spine were represented. The relative risk for pedicle screw perforation was determined to be 0.39 (p < 0.001), favoring navigation. The overall pedicle screw perforation risk for navigation was 6%, while the overall pedicle screw perforation risk was 15% for conventional insertion. No related neurological complications were reported with navigated insertion (4814 screws total); there were 3 neurological complications in the nonnavigated group (3725 screws total). Furthermore, the meta-analysis did not reveal a significant difference in total operative time and estimated blood loss when comparing the 2 modalities.
Conclusions: There is a significantly lower risk of pedicle perforation for navigated screw insertion compared with nonnavigated insertion for all spinal regions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2012.5.SPINE11399 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Robotic Systems in Spinal Surgery: A Review of Accuracy, Radiation Exposure, Hospital Readmission Rate, Cost, and Adverse Events.
World Neurosurg
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103.
Background: Recent advances within the last decade have allowed robotics to become commonplace in the operating room. In the field of neurosurgery, robotics assist surgeons in pedicle screw placement and vertebral fusion procedures. The purpose of this review is to look at currently used spinal robots available on the market and compare their overall accuracy, cost, radiation exposure, general adverse events, and hospital readmission rates.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPreserving Cervical Mobility: A Novel Robot-Assisted Approach for Atlas Fracture Fixation.
Am J Case Rep
January 2025
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
BACKGROUND The management of unstable atlas fractures remains a subject of ongoing debate and controversy. The conservative surgical treatment commonly involves fusion, resulting in severe loss of cervical spine mobility, and a large incisions and extensive tissue dissection are required. We aim to introduce a novel concept and surgical approach for treating atlas fracture, one that involves minimizing trauma while maintaining mobility of the upper cervical spine without resorting to fusion.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF[Anterior approach for the revision surgery following bone cement augmentation in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures].
Zhongguo Gu Shang
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang, China.
Objective: To observe the clinical outcomes of anterior approach for the revision surgery following unsuccessful bone cement augmentation in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
Methods: A total of 10 patients who experienced unsuccessful bone cement augmentation underwent anterior revision surgery between January 2020 and December 2021. There were 2 males and 8 females.
Comment on: "Comparison of the Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement Using a Fluoroscopy-Assisted Free-Hand Technique With Robotic-Assisted Navigation Using an O-Arm or 3D C-Arm in Scoliosis Surgery" by C. Li et al.
Global Spine J
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Delayed diagnosis of spinal osteoblastoma presenting with radicular pain and scoliosis: A case report.
Int J Surg Case Rep
January 2025
University of Tunis El Manar, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, 1007, Tunisia; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Mongi Slim La Marsa, Tunisia.
Introduction And Importance: Osteoblastoma is a rare benign bone tumor, accounting for 1 % of primary bone tumors, often affecting the spine and sacrum. Accurate diagnosis is essential for appropriate treatment and prognosis.
Case Presentation: A 19-year-old male presented with two years of persistent nocturnal radicular and low back pain unresponsive to anti-inflammatory medications.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!