A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy-influence of graft diameter on endothelial cell loss. | LitMetric

Purpose: To evaluate the potential influence of graft diameter on endothelial cell loss after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Methods: A retrospective interventional case series of eyes treated with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (n = 695) with at least 1-year follow-up at Price Vision Group (Indianapolis, IN) was analyzed, excluding eyes with prior glaucoma surgery. Graft diameters ranged from 7.5 to 9.5 mm, with 8.5- and 9-mm grafts accounting for the majority. Endothelial cell loss was assessed as a function of graft diameter by analysis of variance.

Results: Mean baseline donor endothelial cell density was 3039 cells per mm for 8.5-mm grafts (n = 225) and 3026 cells per mm for 9-mm grafts (n = 409). Mean endothelial cell density and postoperative endothelial cell loss at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years was 2070 (32%), 1999 (34%), 1920 (37%), 1865 (39%), and 1617 (47%) cells per mm for 8.5-mm grafts versus 2098 (30%), 2019 (33%), 1857 (38%), 1854 (38%), and 1619 (46%) cells per mm for 9.0-mm grafts, respectively. Differences were not statistically significant at any time point. The rates of graft dislocation and immunologic rejection episode were comparable for 8.5-mm and 9.0-mm grafts (both P > 0.05).

Conclusions: A larger graft diameter (9 mm) theoretically provides a larger reservoir of healthy endothelial cells but did not result in significantly less cell loss than a smaller diameter (8.5 mm) in eyes with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy during the 5-year follow-up.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e318247311aDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

endothelial cell
24
cell loss
20
graft diameter
16
endothelial
13
descemet stripping
12
stripping automated
12
automated endothelial
12
fuchs endothelial
12
endothelial keratoplasty
8
keratoplasty fuchs
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!