The last 20 years have seen a staggering growth in the practice of off-shoring clinical research to low-and middle-income countries (LICs and MICs), a growth that has been matched by the neoliberal policies adopted by host countries towards attracting trials to their shores. A recurring concern in this context is the charge of exploitation, linked to various aspects of off-shoring. In this paper, I examine Alan Wertheimer's approach and offer an alternative view of understanding exploitation in this context. I will suggest that the justification for the enterprise of research is largely dependent on its integration within a health system from which participants regularly benefit and I argue that an attention to a principle of reciprocity will enable us to better recognize and address exploitation in international research.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00332.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

off-shoring clinical
8
exploitation
4
clinical exploitation
4
exploitation reciprocity
4
reciprocity constraint
4
constraint years
4
years staggering
4
staggering growth
4
growth practice
4
practice off-shoring
4

Similar Publications

Objective: To observe the clinical effect of nasal surgical expansion as basical surgical treatment of patients with OSAHS.

Method: A total of 320 patients with OSAHS were retrospectively analyzed. The patient was diagnosed by PSG.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The last 20 years have seen a staggering growth in the practice of off-shoring clinical research to low-and middle-income countries (LICs and MICs), a growth that has been matched by the neoliberal policies adopted by host countries towards attracting trials to their shores. A recurring concern in this context is the charge of exploitation, linked to various aspects of off-shoring. In this paper, I examine Alan Wertheimer's approach and offer an alternative view of understanding exploitation in this context.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To investigate the administrative barriers that impact the opening of clinical trials at the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center (VICC) and at VICC Affiliate Network (VICCAN) sites.

Methods: VICC, a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center, and three VICCAN community practice sites were studied. Methodology used was identification and mapping of existing processes and analysis of historical timing data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!