Evidence that contour-shapes and texture-shapes are processed by different mechanisms included the finding that contour-shape aftereffects are reduced when the adaptation stimulus is a texture made of contours rather than a single contour. This phenomenon has been termed texture-surround suppression of contour-shape, or TSSCS. How does TSSCS operate and over what spatial extent? We measured the postadaptation shift in the apparent shape frequency of a single sinusoidal-shaped contour as a function of the number of contours in the adaptor stimulus. Contours were Gabor strings in which the Gabor orientations were either tangential (snakes) or orthogonal (ladders) to the path of the contour. We found that for extended surrounds, the aftereffect was strongly reduced when the surround contours were the same as the central adaptor contour, but not when the Gabors making up the surround contours were opposite-in-orientation to those of the central adaptor. For near surrounds, the aftereffect in a snake contour was unaffected by same-orientation but strongly suppressed by opposite-orientation surrounds, whereas the aftereffect for a ladder-contour was suppressed equally by both same- and opposite-orientation near surrounds. Finally, the strength of surround suppression decreased gradually with increasing spatial separation between center and surround. These results indicate that there are two components to texture-surround suppression in our shape aftereffect: one that is sensitive to opposite-orientation texture surrounds, operates locally, and disrupts contour-processing; the other that is sensitive to same-orientation texture surrounds, is spatially extended, and prevents the shape of the contour from being processed as a contour. We also demonstrate that the observed shape aftereffects are not due to changes in the apparent shape-frequency of the adaptors or the precision with which their shape-frequency is encoded, indicating that TSSCS is not an instance of crowding.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/12.6.20 | DOI Listing |
J Vis
October 2019
Department of Ophthalmology, McGill Vision Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Studies have revealed that textures suppress the processing of the shapes of contours they surround. One manifestation of texture-surround suppression is the reduction in the magnitude of adaptation-induced contour-shape aftereffects when the adaptor contour is surrounded by a texture. Here we utilize this phenomenon to investigate the nature of the first-order inputs to texture-surround suppression of contour shape by examining its selectivity to luminance polarity and the magnitude of luminance contrast.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Vis
June 2012
Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Evidence that contour-shapes and texture-shapes are processed by different mechanisms included the finding that contour-shape aftereffects are reduced when the adaptation stimulus is a texture made of contours rather than a single contour. This phenomenon has been termed texture-surround suppression of contour-shape, or TSSCS. How does TSSCS operate and over what spatial extent? We measured the postadaptation shift in the apparent shape frequency of a single sinusoidal-shaped contour as a function of the number of contours in the adaptor stimulus.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Vis
June 2012
Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Contour-shape coding is color selective (Gheorghiu & Kingdom, 2007a) and surround textures inhibit the processing of contour shapes (Gheorghiu & Kingdom, 2011; Kingdom & Prins, 2009). These two findings raise two questions: (1) is texture-surround suppression of contour shape color selective, and (2) is texture-shape processing color selective? To answer these questions, we measured the shape-frequency aftereffect using contours constructed from strings of Gabors defined along the red-green, blue-yellow, and luminance axes of cardinal color space. The stimuli were either single sinusoidal-shaped contours or textures made of sinusoidal-shaped contours arranged in parallel.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeuroreport
January 2009
epartment of Ophthalmology, McGill University, McGill Vision Research, Quebec, Canada.
Contextual influences on neurons in the primary visual cortex have largely been studied using simple visual stimuli and their functional role is still poorly understood. Using a novel visual after-effect of perceived shape we show psychophysically that the coding of a contour's shape is inhibited by nearby parallel, but not orthogonal texture orientations. This suggests that neurons in the visual cortex that are suppressed by parallel orientations feed their outputs into higher visual areas that are involved in the processing of contour shape and in the recognition of objects.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFVision Res
September 2002
Visual Perception Laboratory, Göttingen, Germany.
A target that differs in orientation from neighboring lines and "pops out" has been found to evoke larger responses in cortical V1 cells than lines in the uniform texture surround which do not popout (e.g., Journal of Neurophysiology 67 (1992) 961).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!