Objective: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR) in selected high risk patients. While improvement in left ventricular function after TAVI has been demonstrated, little is known about the impact on right ventricular (RV) function. Since postoperative RV dysfunction is linked to adverse outcomes, the authors sought to investigate the effect of TAVI and aortic valve replacement (AVR) on RV function using speckle tracking echocardiography.
Design: Cross-sectional study in tertiary healthcare setting.
Setting: 101 patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (age 81 ± 11 yrs) who underwent TAVI and 22 patients who underwent sAVR were included. RV function was assessed using 2D longitudinal strain (RV-LS), fractional area change and tricuspid annular plain systolic excursion before and after sAVR and TAVI (median 89 days).
Results: Although the TAVI group had worse baseline characteristics, RV function remained unchanged in this group whereas significant deterioration of RV function was observed in patients undergoing conventional AVR: RV-LS (-25.2 ± 6.1 vs -20.0 ± 7.0%; p=0.009), RV-fractional area change (47.0 ± 7.0 vs 39.8 ± 10.7%, p=0.019) and tricuspid annular plain systolic excursion (24 ± 5 vs 16 ± 4 mm, p=0.0001).
Conclusion: While TAVI did not affect RV function it deteriorated significantly in patients undergoing sAVR. The authors speculate that this may be related to the detrimental effects of pericardiotomy and, to a lesser degree, cardiopulmonary bypass. While further studies are required to assess the clinical significance of this finding, these data suggest that patients with pre-existing RV dysfunction may benefit from TAVI and that RV function should be incorporated into future risk scores.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301203 | DOI Listing |
JTCVS Open
December 2024
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Jefferson Health, Philadelphia, Pa.
Objective: To compare outcomes of aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with pure aortic stenosis (Pure AS) and those with pure aortic regurgitation (Pure AR) or mixed AS and AR (MAVD) in the COMMENCE trial.
Methods: Of 689 patients who underwent AVR in the COMMENCE trial, patients with moderate or severe AR with or without AS (Pure AR + MAVD; n = 135) or Pure AS (n = 323) were included. Inverse probability of treatment weighting Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used for time-to-event endpoints, and longitudinal changes in hemodynamics were evaluated using mixed-effects models.
JTCVS Open
December 2024
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Objective: The superior transseptal approach to mitral valve surgery offers improved exposure compared with left atriotomy; however, concerns remain regarding postoperative arrhythmias and pacemaker placement. This study investigates intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcomes in these approaches.
Methods: Retrospective review of 259 adults undergoing isolated mitral valve repair or replacement over a 10-year period was performed.
JTCVS Open
December 2024
Cardiothoracic Department, The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Objective: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication after cardiac surgery that is associated with other adverse outcomes. Recent studies have shown that drainage of pericardial effusion by a posterior pericardial incision reduces the incidence of POAF. An alternative approach is a chest tube placed posteriorly in the pericardium.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJTCVS Open
December 2024
Division of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif.
Objective: The study objective was to investigate the effect of free-edge length on valve performance in bicuspidization repair of congenitally diseased aortic valves.
Methods: In addition to a constructed unicuspid aortic valve disease model, 3 representative groups-free-edge length to aortic diameter ratio 1.2, 1.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!