Cannula detachment during cataract surgery: results of a survey.

Can J Ophthalmol

Department of Ophthalmology, Birmingham & Midland Eye Centre, Birmingham, UK.

Published: June 2012

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to determine if cannula displacement during cataract surgery with Luer locks is a common issue, surveying U.K. ophthalmologists.
  • Results showed 60 reported cases of cannula detachment, primarily due to stromal hydration (50%), with some serious complications like retinal damage (9%) and vitreous loss (17%).
  • The authors recommend that surgeons ensure a secure connection when using the cannula and use a new one for each stage of the operation, especially for viscoelastic.

Article Abstract

Objective: To ascertain whether cannula displacement during cataract surgery with the use of the Luer lock is a common and recognized complication.

Methods: A questionnaire was sent to attending physicians on the Royal College of Ophthalmologists U.K. register inquiring about episodes of cannula displacement and complications.

Results: Despite the use of Luer locks, 60 cases of cannula detachment were reported; 196 respondents experienced this complication, and the most common cause of cannula detachment was stromal hydration (50%). Hydrodissection and viscoelastic were experienced by 18% and 17%, respectively. No severe damage resulted in most cases (76 cases), but some serious complications were reported: retinal damage (9%) and vitreous loss (17%).

Conclusions: We recommend that surgeons test the union carefully themselves and then test the system by squirting outside the eye. Additionally, we recommend that a new cannula be used for each stage of the procedure. The viscoelastic cannula, in particular, should not be used for any other purpose.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.03.022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cannula detachment
12
cataract surgery
8
cannula displacement
8
cannula
7
detachment cataract
4
surgery survey
4
survey objective
4
objective ascertain
4
ascertain cannula
4
displacement cataract
4

Similar Publications

"Caution with choroidals" - choose the right one at right time.

Indian J Ophthalmol

December 2024

Department of Oculoplasty, Disha Eye Hospitals Pvt Ltd, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Article Synopsis
  • Choroidal detachment (CD) during retinal detachment surgery can negatively affect surgical results and vision, necessitating specific management techniques.
  • Cannula-guided choroidal drainage is essential for mitigating pre-existing CDs, especially in complex cases with hemorrhagic detachment.
  • Intraoperative sudden CD can be caused by issues like hypotony or air entry from cannula slippage, which may lead to serious complications like Venous Air Embolism (VAE); prompt action to stop air infusion is critical to prevent life-threatening outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To compare functional and anatomical outcomes between posterior drainage of residual fluid using a 41G cannula, fluid tolerance (R-SRF), and conventional complete drainage methods, including removal through peripheral retinal breaks (PRB), perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL), and posterior retinotomy (PR).

Methods: In this retrospective, multicenter study, we evaluated cases for visual acuity (VA) at 3 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included surgical success, postoperative metamorphopsia, shifts, full-thickness folds (FTF), optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters, and safety.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Modified pendulum osteotomy to correct severe tibial varus deformity].

Oper Orthop Traumatol

October 2024

Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus Berlin, Caspar Theyss Str. 27-33, 14193, Berlin, Deutschland.

Objective: Correction of a severe tibial varus deformity near the knee joint with only a slight influence on leg length and patella height.

Indications: Medial osteoarthritis and/or cartilage damage with a severe varus deformity > 10° with a medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) < 80°.

Contraindications: Femoral varus deformity with lateral distal femoral angle > 91°, severe lateral cartilage damage, lateral osteoarthritis, lateral meniscus loss.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Autologous minced cartilage implantation for focal cartilage lesions of the humeral capitellum].

Oper Orthop Traumatol

August 2024

Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Plastisch-Ästhetische Chirurgie, Schwerpunkt für Unfall‑, Hand- und Ellenbogenchirurgie, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.

Objective: The goal of minced cartilage implantation (MCI) is to restore an intact cartilage surface in focal osteochondral lesions of the humeral capitellum.

Indications: The indications for MCI are limited osteochondral lesions at the humeral capitellum, also at the head of the radius, with intact cartilage border as well as in situ or a completely detached fragment, and free joint bodies (grade II-grade V according to Hefti).

Contraindications: Contraindications for MCI are already concomitant or associated cartilage damage as well as bilateral osteochondral lesions and insufficient available cartilage material.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!