A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Resection margin in hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. | LitMetric

Resection margin in hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review.

Hepatogastroenterology

Department of Liver and Vascular Surgery, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.

Published: October 2012

Background/aims: To evaluate the influence of the width of resection margin on recurrence and survival for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Methodology: Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized trials evaluating the influence of the width of resection margin for HCC were identified using a predefined search strategy. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled recurrence and survival rate.

Results: One randomized controlled trial and four non-randomized trials were identified. The only randomized controlled trial reported that a margin aiming at 2cm could decrease the recurrence rate (p=0.037) and increase the 3-year survival (p=0.02) and 5-year survival rate (p<0.01) compared with a margin aiming at 1cm. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the group with resection margin <1cm and the group with resection margin ≥1cm in recurrence rate (p=0.08), 1-year survival (p=0.75), 3-year survival (p=0.53) and 5-year survival rate (p=0.15).

Conclusions: A resection margin ≥1cm does not provide significant prognostic benefit compared with a resection margin <1cm. There is limited evidence to show that patients with a resection margin aiming at 2cm have better survival outcome than patients with a resection margin aiming at 1cm.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5754/hge10600DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

resection margin
12
randomized controlled
12
influence width
8
width resection
8
recurrence survival
8
non-randomized trials
8
controlled trial
8
margin hepatectomy
4
hepatectomy hepatocellular
4
hepatocellular carcinoma
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!