Objective: To evaluate the discrepancy of root canal filling (RCF) measurements obtained from original root specimens and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.

Material And Methods: Seventy-two human maxillary anterior teeth were prepared up to an ISO #50 K-File 1 mm short of the apical foramen. Thus, the teeth were randomly divided into 8 groups, according to the root canal filling material: Sealapex®, Sealapex®+gutta-percha points, Sealer 26®, Sealer 26®+gutta-percha points, AH PlusTM, AH PlusTM+gutta-percha points, Grossman Sealer, and Grossman Sealer+gutta-percha points. After root canal preparation and RCF, CBCT scans were acquired and the specimens were sectioned in axial, sagittal and coronal planes. The RCF measurements were obtained in different planes and thicknesses to determine the discrepancy between the original root specimens (using a digital caliper) and the CBCT images (using the scanner's proprietary software). One-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests were used for statistical analyses. The significance level was set at α=5%.

Results: Measurements of the different endodontic filling materials were 9% to 100% greater on the CBCT images than on the original root specimens. Greater RCF dimensions were found when only sealers were used, with statistically significant difference among the groups.

Conclusions: RCF dimensions were greater on CBCT images than on the original root specimens, especially when only sealer was used.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894773PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572012000200023DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

root canal
16
original root
16
root specimens
16
canal filling
12
cbct images
12
root
8
filling materials
8
cone-beam computed
8
computed tomography
8
rcf measurements
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!