A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Radiofrequency ablation for colorectal liver metastases: prognostic factors in non-surgical candidates. | LitMetric

Purpose: To determine prognostic factors in patients with colorectal liver metastases who were not surgical candidates and received liver radiofrequency (RF) ablation.

Materials And Methods: RF ablation was done for 141 colorectal liver metastases in 84 patients. There were 63 (75.0 %, 63/84) males and 21 (25.0 %, 21/84) females, with a mean age of 64.6 ± 10.3. The mean maximum tumor diameter was 2.3 ± 1.4 cm (range 0.5-9.0 cm). Extrahepatic metastases were associated at the time of liver RF ablation in 23 patients (27.4 %, 23/84), and 12 (14.3 %, 12/84) had lung metastases considered controllable by planned lung RF ablation. Prognostic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results: There was no procedure-related mortality. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 90.6 % (95 %CI, 83.9-97.2 %), 44.9 % (95 %CI, 31.8-57.9 %), and 20.8 % (95 %CI, 7.3-34.3 %), respectively, with a median survival of 34.9 months. The univariate analysis showed that tumor diameter larger than 3 cm, tumor multiplicity, uncontrollable extrahepatic disease, and previous chemotherapy history were significantly worse prognostic factors. The former three factors remained significant for worse prognosis in the multivariate Cox model. Extrahepatic disease was not a prognostic factor when it could be controlled.

Conclusion: Tumor size and number, and uncontrollable extrahepatic metastases were significant prognostic factors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11604-012-0089-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prognostic factors
20
colorectal liver
12
liver metastases
12
metastases prognostic
8
tumor diameter
8
extrahepatic metastases
8
uncontrollable extrahepatic
8
extrahepatic disease
8
metastases
6
prognostic
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!