Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: In high-risk patients with left bundle-branch block (LBBB), functional but not perfusion parameters yield incremental prognostic information. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prognostic value of gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in low-intermediate risk LBBB patients.
Methods: One hundred seventy-six subjects underwent stress-rest dual-day protocol 99mTc sestamibi-gated SPECT and were dichotomized in two groups: without LBBB (Group 1, n = 86) and with LBBB (Group 2, n = 90). Patients were followed for 32 ± 18 months. Cox regression multivariate analysis was used to determine which variable was the best predictor of cardiac event. Event-free survival curves were computed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Results: Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy was abnormal in 32 and 60 patients for Groups 1 and 2, respectively (37 vs. 67 %, p < 0.001). In Groups 1 and 2, the mean summed stress score (SSS) was 3.7 ± 5.6 versus 6.7 ± 6.4, while the mean summed difference score (SDS) was 1.6 ± 2.5 versus 2.7 ± 3.3 (both p < 0.005); therefore 34 % of patients in Group 1 and 53 % of those in Group 2 presented myocardial ischemia. All functional parameters were significantly different between the two subsets (all p < 0.005). Follow-up was completed in 161 patients (92 %); 10 events occurred in Group 1 and 20 in Group 2 (14 vs. 25 %). The event-free survival was significantly higher in patients with normal than in those with abnormal scan (85 vs. 63 %, p < 0.005); moreover, the prognosis of patients with LBBB was significantly worse. At multivariate analysis, SDS was found to be the only independent predictor of cardiac events both in all patients and in LBBB population (HR 3.08, and HR 4.99, p < 0.05).
Conclusions: This is the first study to assess the prognostic value of gated SPECT in patients with LBBB and low-intermediate cardiac risk. Both perfusion and functional data obtained by gated SPECT are different between patients with and without LBBB. However, SDS is the only predictor of events. Thus, the amount of reversible ischemia at gated SPECT has a discriminative power in stratifying the cardiac risk of LBBB population.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12149-012-0613-4 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!