A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Risk stratification and prognostic assessment by myocardial perfusion-gated SPECT in patients with left bundle-branch block and low-intermediate cardiac risk. | LitMetric

Objective: In high-risk patients with left bundle-branch block (LBBB), functional but not perfusion parameters yield incremental prognostic information. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prognostic value of gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in low-intermediate risk LBBB patients.

Methods: One hundred seventy-six subjects underwent stress-rest dual-day protocol 99mTc sestamibi-gated SPECT and were dichotomized in two groups: without LBBB (Group 1, n = 86) and with LBBB (Group 2, n = 90). Patients were followed for 32 ± 18 months. Cox regression multivariate analysis was used to determine which variable was the best predictor of cardiac event. Event-free survival curves were computed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy was abnormal in 32 and 60 patients for Groups 1 and 2, respectively (37 vs. 67 %, p < 0.001). In Groups 1 and 2, the mean summed stress score (SSS) was 3.7 ± 5.6 versus 6.7 ± 6.4, while the mean summed difference score (SDS) was 1.6 ± 2.5 versus 2.7 ± 3.3 (both p < 0.005); therefore 34 % of patients in Group 1 and 53 % of those in Group 2 presented myocardial ischemia. All functional parameters were significantly different between the two subsets (all p < 0.005). Follow-up was completed in 161 patients (92 %); 10 events occurred in Group 1 and 20 in Group 2 (14 vs. 25 %). The event-free survival was significantly higher in patients with normal than in those with abnormal scan (85 vs. 63 %, p < 0.005); moreover, the prognosis of patients with LBBB was significantly worse. At multivariate analysis, SDS was found to be the only independent predictor of cardiac events both in all patients and in LBBB population (HR 3.08, and HR 4.99, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: This is the first study to assess the prognostic value of gated SPECT in patients with LBBB and low-intermediate cardiac risk. Both perfusion and functional data obtained by gated SPECT are different between patients with and without LBBB. However, SDS is the only predictor of events. Thus, the amount of reversible ischemia at gated SPECT has a discriminative power in stratifying the cardiac risk of LBBB population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12149-012-0613-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients lbbb
16
spect patients
12
cardiac risk
12
gated spect
12
patients
11
lbbb
9
patients left
8
left bundle-branch
8
bundle-branch block
8
low-intermediate cardiac
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!