Conservation and divergence between cytoplasmic and muscle-specific actin capping proteins: insights from the crystal structure of cytoplasmic Cap32/34 from Dictyostelium discoideum.

BMC Struct Biol

Abteilung NMR basierte Strukturbiologie, Max-Planck-Institut für Biophysikalische Chemie, Am Fassberg 11, D-37077, Göttingen, Germany.

Published: June 2012

AI Article Synopsis

  • Capping protein (CP), crucial for regulating actin filament dynamics, consists of α- and β-subunits, with distinct variants seen in different tissues like muscle and non-muscle.
  • The atomic structure of Cap32/34 from Dictyostelium discoideum has been solved and compared to chicken muscle CapZ, revealing similarities but also notable structural differences, particularly in flexibility.
  • These differences suggest that structural flexibility in the CP variants contributes to their distinct interactions with actin, impacting their function in cytoplasmic versus sarcomeric environments.

Article Abstract

Background: Capping protein (CP), also known as CapZ in muscle cells and Cap32/34 in Dictyostelium discoideum, plays a major role in regulating actin filament dynamics. CP is a ubiquitously expressed heterodimer comprising an α- and β-subunit. It tightly binds to the fast growing end of actin filaments, thereby functioning as a "cap" by blocking the addition and loss of actin subunits. Vertebrates contain two somatic variants of CP, one being primarily found at the cell periphery of non-muscle tissues while the other is mainly localized at the Z-discs of skeletal muscles.

Results: To elucidate structural and functional differences between cytoplasmic and sarcomercic CP variants, we have solved the atomic structure of Cap32/34 (32=β- and 34=α-subunit) from the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium at 2.2 Å resolution and compared it to that of chicken muscle CapZ. The two homologs display a similar overall arrangement including the attached α-subunit C-terminus (α-tentacle) and the flexible β-tentacle. Nevertheless, the structures exhibit marked differences suggesting considerable structural flexibility within the α-subunit. In the α-subunit we observed a bending motion of the β-sheet region located opposite to the position of the C-terminal β-tentacle towards the antiparallel helices that interconnect the heterodimer. Recently, a two domain twisting attributed mainly to the β-subunit has been reported. At the hinge of these two domains Cap32/34 contains an elongated and highly flexible loop, which has been reported to be important for the interaction of cytoplasmic CP with actin and might contribute to the more dynamic actin-binding of cytoplasmic compared to sarcomeric CP (CapZ).

Conclusions: The structure of Cap32/34 from Dictyostelium discoideum allowed a detailed analysis and comparison between the cytoplasmic and sarcomeric variants of CP. Significant structural flexibility could particularly be found within the α-subunit, a loop region in the β-subunit, and the surface of the α-globule where the amino acid differences between the cytoplasmic and sarcomeric mammalian CP are located. Hence, the crystal structure of Cap32/34 raises the possibility of different binding behaviours of the CP variants toward the barbed end of actin filaments, a feature, which might have arisen from adaptation to different environments.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3472329PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6807-12-12DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cap32/34 dictyostelium
12
dictyostelium discoideum
12
structure cap32/34
12
crystal structure
8
actin filaments
8
differences cytoplasmic
8
structural flexibility
8
flexibility α-subunit
8
cytoplasmic sarcomeric
8
cytoplasmic
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!