Objective: This single-case study of a boy with autism and high-frequency aggression concerned the effects of classroom teachers wearing protective equipment (gloves) on injuries produced to their hands as well as injuries sustained to non-protected areas of the body.

Methods: A reversal-type design was used to evaluate the effects of protective equipment relative to a baseline (no protective equipment) phase, a low-demand activity phase without protective equipment and a low-demand activity phase with protective equipment.

Results: The protective equipment intervention eliminated hand injuries, did not result in other types of injuries, was not associated with increased aggression and was rated favourably by the classroom teachers.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that staff-worn protective equipment may be a valuable component of comprehensive clinical safety programmes within service settings for children with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2012.676100DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

protective equipment
28
protective
8
staff-worn protective
8
low-demand activity
8
activity phase
8
phase protective
8
equipment
7
preventing injury
4
injury child
4
child aggression
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!