The psychotherapist-patient privilege, rooted in both common and statutory law, is predicated upon the public policy goal of protecting the reasonable expectation of privacy of individuals seeking psychotherapy. The privilege is not absolute, however. State and federal courts are far from uniform in determining how and when the privilege should be waived, in whole or in part, through implication, inadvertence or the affirmative action of the parties. In the family law context, the law that has evolved around the exercise of this privilege is even more complex as the needs of children add another wrinkle to the goal of balancing the imperative of confidentiality with the need for useful information that may be provided.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Attorney-client privilege was held by the Supreme Court to extend beyond death in 1996, albeit only ratifying centuries of accepted practice in the lower courts and England before them. But with the lawyer's client dead, the natural outcome of such a rule is that privilege--the legal enforcement of secrecy--will persist forever, for only the dead client could ever have waived and thus end it. Perpetuity is not traditionally favored by the law for good reason, and yet a long and broad line of precedent endorses its application to privilege.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTrends in Confidentiality and Disclosure.
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ)
October 2019
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai St. Luke's-West Hospital, Mount Sinai Beth Israel Hospital, New York, NY.
Confidentiality has long been a core value in medical ethics, but the parameters of this value have rapidly evolved. The principle is now best understood in the context of competing loyalties: Physicians owe patients a broad duty to protect confidences, but that duty is limited-in specific circumstances-by a competing obligation to protect the health of others and the general public welfare. The trend is increasingly toward more disclosure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe risks and benefits of disclosing psychotherapy records to the legal system: What psychologists and patients need to know for informed consent.
Int J Law Psychiatry
October 2016
University of Maine School of Law, 246 Deering Avenue, Portland, ME 04102, United States. Electronic address:
When psychologists release patient records to the legal system, the typical practice is to obtain the patient's signature on a consent form, but rarely is a formal informed-consent obtained from the patient. Although psychologists are legally and ethically required to obtain informed consent for all services (including disclosure of records), there are a number of barriers to obtaining truly informed consent. Furthermore, compared to disclosures to nonlegal third parties, there are significantly greater risks when records are disclosed to the legal system.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe psychotherapist-patient privilege, rooted in both common and statutory law, is predicated upon the public policy goal of protecting the reasonable expectation of privacy of individuals seeking psychotherapy. The privilege is not absolute, however. State and federal courts are far from uniform in determining how and when the privilege should be waived, in whole or in part, through implication, inadvertence or the affirmative action of the parties.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAccessibility to a parent's psychotherapy records in custody disputes: how can the competing interests be balanced?
Behav Sci Law
November 2010
Burbach & Stansbury S.C., 10850 W. Park Place, Suite 530, Milwaukee, WI 53224, USA.
One of the issues that commonly arises in custody disputes is whether one parent or the court may obtain access to the records of the other parent's mental health treatment. The answer to this question varies across jurisdictions given that states do not treat the medical/psychological therapeutic privilege uniformly. These differences demonstrate the competing interests whenever a party's mental health records become an issue in a custody proceeding, and the attempt to balance the interests when the therapeutic privilege is asserted.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!