A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Paired associative stimulation increases motor cortex excitability more effectively than theta-burst stimulation. | LitMetric

Objective: To examine the effects of theta burst stimulation (TBS) and paired associative stimulation (PAS) on excitability in the human motor cortex.

Methods: Sixteen healthy young participants received intermittent TBS (iTBS) or PAS to the primary motor cortex on two testing occasions, at least a week apart. Ten of the participants also received iTBS or PAS after conditioning with continuous TBS on two other occasions. Cortical excitability was assessed with single TMS pulses to the motor cortex. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured from the first dorsal interosseus (FDI) muscle before TBS or PAS stimulation, and every 10min for 60min after stimulation. Changes in excitability were compared against the potential for motor learning, assessed with the rotor pursuit task.

Results: After the PAS protocol MEP amplitudes were significantly increased. This increase was greater than after intermittent TBS, which did not change MEPs significantly. Conditioning with continuous TBS showed no significant effect. Participants' responses were not correlated across protocols and were not correlated with rotor pursuit learning.

Conclusions: PAS was the only protocol which induced significant increases in MEP amplitude.

Significance: PAS is robust in inducing excitatory cortical change. This makes it a suitable protocol for testing plasticity in healthy and patient groups.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2012.03.081DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

motor cortex
12
paired associative
8
associative stimulation
8
participants received
8
intermittent tbs
8
itbs pas
8
conditioning continuous
8
continuous tbs
8
rotor pursuit
8
pas protocol
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!