Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3352807 | PMC |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
A rebuttal to "The ineffectiveness of stretching exercises in patients with fibromyalgia: A systematic review discussion" - comments on "The effectiveness of stretching exercises in patients with fibromyalgia".
Clin Rheumatol
January 2025
Department of Physiotherapy, University College of Northern Denmark (UCN), Selma Lagerløfs Vej 2, 9220, Aalborg East, Denmark.
Rebuttal submission to "Failure of AI-driven diagnostic tool: lessons and strategies to prevent patient harm".
Arch Osteoporos
August 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-Cho, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Rebuttal to "Comment on: Fate After the Mustard Procedure for d-Transposition of the Great Arteries: Impact of Age, Complexity, and Atrial Tachyarrhythmias: A Single Center Experience" by Iman Akram.
Pediatr Cardiol
October 2024
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Neonatology, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen, Germany.
Access to Expensive Therapies and Diagnostics for Kidney Care in Switzerland.
Kidney360
September 2024
Nephrology Department, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Key Points: Inconsistent responses to the prior approval process for similar patients may lead to inequities in access to optimal care. The prior authorizations process leads to frustration among nephrologists and may contribute to moral distress. The prior authorizations process may lead to important delays in kidney care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLowering the Age of Consent for Vaccination to Promote Pediatric Vaccination: It's Worth a Shot.
J Law Med Ethics
May 2024
HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS, USA.
This paper challenges historically preconceived notions surrounding a minor's ability to make medical decisions, arguing that federal health law should be reformed to allow minors with capacity as young as age 12 to consent to their own Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC)-approved COVID-19 vaccinations. This proposal aligns with and expands upon current exceptions to limitations on adolescent decision-making. This analysis reviews the historic and current anti-vaccination sentiment, examines legal precedence and rationale, outlines supporting ethical arguments regarding adolescent decision-making, and offers rebuttals to anticipated ethical counterarguments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!