Individual differences in metacontrast masking regarding sensitivity and response bias.

Conscious Cogn

Georg-Elias-Müller Institute for Psychology, Georg-August University Göttingen, Gosslerstr. 14, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany.

Published: September 2012

In metacontrast masking target visibility is modulated by the time until a masking stimulus appears. The effect of this temporal delay differs across participants in such a way that individual human observers' performance shows distinguishable types of masking functions which remain largely unchanged for months. Here we examined whether individual differences in masking functions depend on different response criteria in addition to differences in discrimination sensitivity. To this end we reanalyzed previously published data and conducted a new experiment for further data analyses. Our analyses demonstrate that a distinction of masking functions based on the type of masking stimulus is superior to a distinction based on the target-mask congruency. Individually different masking functions are based on individual differences in discrimination sensitivities and in response criteria. Results suggest that individual differences in metacontrast masking result from individually different criterion contents.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.04.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

individual differences
16
masking functions
16
metacontrast masking
12
masking
9
differences metacontrast
8
masking stimulus
8
response criteria
8
differences discrimination
8
functions based
8
individual
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!