Objective: To assess the agreement of tonometers available for clinical practice with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), the most commonly accepted reference device.

Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of directly comparative studies assessing the agreement of 1 or more tonometers with the reference tonometer (GAT).

Participants: A total of 11 582 participants (15 525 eyes) were included.

Methods: Summary 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were produced for each comparison.

Main Outcome Measures: Agreement, recordability, and reliability.

Results: A total of 102 studies, including 130 paired comparisons, were included, representing 8 tonometers: dynamic contour tonometer, noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer, Ocuton S, handheld applanation tonometer (HAT), rebound tonometer, transpalpebral tonometer, and Tono-Pen. The agreement (95% limits) seemed to vary across tonometers: 0.2 mmHg (-3.8 to 4.3 mmHg) for the NCT to 2.7 mmHg (-4.1 to 9.6 mmHg) for the Ocuton S. The estimated proportion within 2 mmHg of the GAT ranged from 33% (Ocuton S) to 66% and 59% (NCT and HAT, respectively). Substantial inter- and intraobserver variability were observed for all tonometers.

Conclusions: The NCT and HAT seem to achieve a measurement closest to the GAT. However, there was substantial variability in measurements both within and between studies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.030DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

agreement tonometers
12
systematic review
8
goldmann applanation
8
applanation tonometer
8
95% limits
8
nct hat
8
tonometer
7
agreement
6
tonometers
5
mmhg
5

Similar Publications

Purpose: This study aims to perform a clinical investigation of an innovative rebound technology-based device, the M-TONX, to simultaneously measure intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT).

Methods: The IOP and CCT of the patients were first measured by the M-TONX. Then, the measurements were repeated by the Goldman applanation (GAT) and the Pentacam corneal topographer, as the standard devices.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Intraocular pressure (IOP) readings using three different methods (Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), Corvis ST, and iCare) were compared in patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK). : An observational cross-sectional study with prospective recruitment of patients was conducted. IOP measurements were acquired using GAT, iCare, and Corvis (including both uncorrected IOP (CVS-IOP) and biomechanical IOP (bIOP)), and the agreement among methods was analyzed using Bland-Altman plots.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To investigate the agreement between the Icare HOME tonometer and the Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT) in assessing the Peak Intraocular Pressure during the Water-Drinking Test (WDT).

Design: Prospective cross-sectional study.

Subjects: 79 eyes of 41 open-angle glaucoma patients were included in the study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Topic: The systematic review and meta-analysis consolidates the extant body of evidence comparing reliability and agreement between transpalpebral tonometers (TTs) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT).

Clinical Relevance: With a global prevalence of 3.54 percent, glaucoma stands as the second leading cause of preventable blindness.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Agreement of intraocular pressure measurement by scleral Schiotz and Goldmann applanation tonometer.

Sci Rep

November 2024

Department of Community Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (SBV), Deemed to be University, Puducherry, India.

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to explore the agreement between intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with a scleral Schiotz tonometer and the more commonly used Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT).
  • It involved 155 patients, measuring IOP through both methods, and analyzed factors like age and central corneal thickness to see their impact on IOP readings.
  • Results indicated that the scleral measurements aligned well with GAT values, suggesting that scleral tonometry could serve as a reliable alternative for measuring IOP in clinical settings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!