Impact of routine pathology review on treatment for node-negative breast cancer.

J Clin Oncol

British Columbia Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Published: June 2012

Purpose: Routine secondary pathology review influences diagnosis and treatment among patients diagnosed with breast cancer. The impact of review on patients with node-negative breast cancer and the nature of the pathology elements leading to management changes are not well described.

Methods: Patients with node-negative, invasive, or in situ breast cancer and evaluable nodes referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency during two time periods between 2004 and 2007 were included. Pathologists with expertise in breast cancer reviewed the original reports and slides. Biomarker testing was not routinely repeated. Medical record review was conducted to determine whether original pathology was changed and whether recommended therapy was affected.

Results: Among 906 eligible patients, 405 (45%) received a pathology review. Univariate comparisons revealed that reviewed patients were younger (P < .001) and more likely to have close margins (P < .001), whereas other characteristics were similar. A total of 102 pathology changes were documented among 81 patients (20%). The most frequently changed elements were grade (40%) and lymphovascular (26%), nodal (15%), and margin (12%) status. These changes resulted in 27 treatment modifications among 25 patients (6%). Treatment changes were primarily related to nodal and margin status, and only two of 27 were related to measurement of tumor biology in women with estrogen receptor-positive, node-negative breast cancer.

Conclusion: Reported rates of change are significant and warrant routine secondary pathology review among patients with node-negative breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ before final treatment is recommended. Review remains relevant in the era of gene expression signatures to determine margin and nodal status.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.38.9247DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast cancer
24
pathology review
16
node-negative breast
16
patients node-negative
12
routine secondary
8
secondary pathology
8
patients
8
review patients
8
pathology
7
review
7

Similar Publications

A co-registration method to validate optical coherence tomography in the breast surgical cavity.

Heliyon

January 2025

BRITElab, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre Nedlands and Centre for Medical Research, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

Breast-conserving surgery accompanied by adjuvant radiotherapy is the standard of care for patients with early-stage breast cancer. However, re-excision is reported in 20-30 % of cases, largely because of close or involved tumor margins in the specimen. Several intraoperative tumor margin assessment techniques have been proposed to overcome this issue, however, none have been widely adopted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Docetaxel (DTX) is widely utilized in breast cancer treatment. However, cancer cell resistance has limited its anti-tumor efficacy. Some molecules called microRNAs (miRNAs), acting like fine-tuned switches, can influence how breast cancer develops and spreads.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Medication related osteonecrosis (MRONJ) in the management of CTIBL in breast and prostate cancer patients. Joint report by SIPMO AND SIOMMMS.

J Bone Oncol

February 2025

Unit of Oral Medicine and Dentistry for Frail Patients, Department of Rehabilitation, Fragility, and Continuity of Care, Regional Center for Research and Care of MRONJ, University Hospital Palermo, Palermo, PA, Italy.

Background: Low-doses of bone modifying agents (LD-BMAs) compared to those used to treat bone metastases are used in breast or prostate cancer patients on adjuvant endocrine therapy to prevent Cancer Treatment Induced Bone Loss (CTIBL). Their use is associated with an increased risk of developing Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ). However, there is not clarity about strategies aimed to minimize the MRONJ risk in cancer patients at different conditions as low- vs high-doses of BMA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unlabelled: Many breast cancer survivors experience cancer-related fatigue (CRF), and several interventions to treat CRF are available. One way to tailor intervention advice is based on patient preferences. In this study, we explore preference heterogeneity regarding between-attribute and within-attribute preferences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The healthy eating index may not be an appropriate indicator for assessing dietary quality in breast cancer survivors: results from NHANES 2005-2018.

Front Nutr

December 2024

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.

Background: Evidence on the relationship between the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) and mortality in breast cancer (BC) survivors remains inconclusive. Moreover, rare studies have explored the effect of individual HEI components on survival in this population. This study explored the association between the HEI-2020, including total and 13 component scores, and mortality in BC survivors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!