A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A septal angle measured on computed tomographic pulmonary angiography can noninvasively estimate pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. | LitMetric

Purpose: To explore the correlation between a septal angle measured on computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) determined by right heart catheterization in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).

Materials And Methods: Eighty-six patients with CTEPH (54 men, mean age: 53.08±12.43 y) were retrospectively reviewed, and 86 sex-matched and age-matched individuals without pulmonary artery hypertension and pulmonary embolism were used as the control group. All patients with CTEPH underwent CTPA before right heart catheterization. Septal angle was measured on transverse CTPA images as the angle between the interventricular septum and the line joining the midpoint of the sternum to the thoracic vertebral spinous process. Hemodynamic PVR was calculated on the basis of the data from right heart catheterization.

Results: Septal angle was 65.27±12.24 degrees and 39.43±9.79 degrees in the CTEPH group and control group, respectively, which was statistically significant (t=18.139, P=0.000). The septal angle correlated positively with PVR (r=0.629, P=0.000). By stepwise linear regression analysis, the septal angle was shown to be the only variable (r=0.578) that was independently associated with PVR levels, leading to the following equation: PVR=21.591×septal angle-374.641. By receiver operating characteristic analysis, septal angle ≥67.55 degrees had a sensitivity of 71.6% and a specificity of 73.4% for predicting PVR≥1000 dyne s/cm with an area under the curve of 0.739±0.055, which was higher than the area under the curve of right ventricular area/left ventricular area (0.627±0.061) and that of transverse diameter of right ventricle/transverse diameter of left ventricle (0.612±0.060).

Conclusion: The septal angle is a useful tool for estimating PVR in patients with CTEPH.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0b013e3182541142DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

septal angle
32
angle measured
12
patients cteph
12
septal
8
measured computed
8
computed tomographic
8
pulmonary
8
tomographic pulmonary
8
pulmonary angiography
8
pulmonary vascular
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!