The glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP IIb/IIIa) antagonists are the most recent additions to the antiplatelet agents available to the interventional radiologist. The currently available GP IIb/IIIa antagonists are abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban. These medications have demonstrated excellent safety and efficacy in the setting of coronary arterial interventions. The fundamental benefit of the GP IIb/IIIa antagonists lies in their unique mechanism of action: the ability to prevent platelet aggregation, thrombus formation, and distal thromboembolism while preserving initial platelet binding to damaged vascular surfaces. A paucity of data exists regarding the role of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in peripheral vascular interventions. The GP IIb/IIIa antagonists would theoretically provide excellent antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing any of a variety of endovascular interventions during which thrombosis or thromboembolism may endanger distal perfusion in patients with peripheral vascular disease. The goal of this summary is to review the indications for use, pharmacology, and evidence for efficacy of the GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in hopes of translating these data for application in the peripheral arterial circulation. Further research is necessary to determine how these agents may be safely used in combination with other anticoagulants or with stents, efficacy compared with standard regimens, success at preventing distal thromboembolism, and cost effectiveness.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3324199 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1267856 | DOI Listing |
Int J Stroke
November 2024
Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Background: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is the cornerstone treatment for the acute ischemic stroke (AIS) within 4.5 h after onset. Current guidelines recommend administering antiplatelet medications 24 h after IVT.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
November 2024
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
The glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist tirofiban has been shown to prevent thromboembolic events during endovascular procedures, but the benefits and risks of its prophylactic early intraprocedural administration for stand-alone coil embolization of acutely ruptured aneurysms are still unclear. We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of patients treated for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with stand-alone coil embolization. Two study cohorts were compared according to the primary prophylactic antithrombotic medication during the procedure: patients receiving only intravenous heparin (HEP) versus patients receiving tirofiban in addition to heparin prior to final aneurysm obliteration (HEP + TF).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Cardiol
January 2025
Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", University of Catania, Catania, Italy. Electronic address:
Background: Pretreatment with a P2Y inhibitor may be considered in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) referred to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Intravenous cangrelor is an alternative in this setting, where oral absorption can be hindered. The aim of this study was to compare cangrelor administered after coronary angiography (i.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Heart J
December 2024
Medical Clinic II, University Heart Center Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Background And Aims: Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors are recommended in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) for bailout treatment in case of angiographic microvascular obstruction (MVO), also termed no-reflow phenomenon, after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with, however, lacking evidence (class IIa, level C).
Methods: The investigator-initiated, international, multicentre REVERSE-FLOW trial randomized 120 patients with AMI and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade ≤ 2 after primary PCI to optimal medical therapy with or without GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. The primary endpoint was infarct size [percentage of left ventricular (LV) mass assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).
Sci Rep
July 2024
Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
While the efficacy of GpIIb-IIIa-inhibitors during primary PCI (pPCI) for ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) has previously been demonstrated, its ongoing role and safety in combination with newer P2Y12-inhibitors is unclear. We therefore sought to compare outcomes between two centers with divergent approaches to the use of GpIIbIIIa antagonists in pPCI. We performed a retrospective chart review of all-comer STEMI patients treated with pPCI at two high-volume Montreal academic tertiary care centers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!