Accessibility attributes of blood glucose meter and home blood pressure monitor displays for visually impaired persons.

J Diabetes Sci Technol

American Foundation for the Blind (AFB Tech), Huntington, West Virginia 25701, USA.

Published: March 2012

AI Article Synopsis

  • The article addresses accessibility issues in diabetes self-management technology, specifically focusing on the low-contrast and high-glare displays of blood glucose meters and home blood pressure monitors, which can be problematic for individuals with reduced vision.
  • A comparative analysis was conducted on 17 devices (9 BGMs and 8 HBPMs) to measure key display attributes like contrast, reflection, and font height, revealing significant variability in quality across different models.
  • The findings highlighted that while some devices had promising display features, most suffered from poor contrast or high reflection, underscoring the need for established design standards to improve accessibility for users with visual impairments.

Article Abstract

The vast majority of diabetes-related self-management technology utilizes small visual displays (SVDs) that often produce a low level of contrast and suffer from high levels of reflection (glare). This is a major accessibility issue for the 3.5 million Americans with diabetes who have reduced vision. The purpose of this article is to gather comparative data on the key display attributes of the SVDs used in blood glucose meters (BGMs) and home blood pressure monitors (HBPMs) on the market today and determine which displays offer the best prospect for being accessible to people with reduced vision. Nine BGMs and eight HBPMs were identified for this study on the basis of amount of devices sold, fullfunctionality speech output, and advanced display technologies. An optical instrumentation system obtained contrast, reflection (glare), and font height measurements for all 17 displays. The contrast, reflection, and font-height values for the BGMs and HBPMs varied greatly between models. The Michelson contrast values for the BGMs ranged from 11% to 98% and font heights ranged 0.39-1.00 in. for the measurement results. The HBPMs had Michelson contrast values ranging 55-96% and font height ranging 0.28-0.94 in. for the measurement results. Due largely to the lack of display design standards for the technical requirements of SVDs, there is tremendous variability in the quality and readability of BGM and HBPM displays. There were two BGMs and one HBPM that exhibited high-contrast values and large font heights, but most of the devices exhibited either poor contrast or exceptionally high reflection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3380764PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/193229681200600206DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

blood glucose
8
blood pressure
8
reflection glare
8
reduced vision
8
bgms hbpms
8
contrast reflection
8
font height
8
values bgms
8
michelson contrast
8
contrast values
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!