Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
A modified technique for the recovery of larvae from pasture is described involving two centrifugations of pasture washings in a solution of potassium iodide. On average, the technique recovered 96% of larvae and was simple to perform. At three sites in South Australia (rainfall 550-330 mm year-1), the numbers of larvae present on pasture each month using this technique was compared with results obtained using one or four tracer sheep. The general pattern of larval availability was similar using the two methods, but discrepancies were noted. In some instances, particularly when numbers of larvae were low, pasture sampling underestimated the numbers of larvae available to sheep; in other situations, when the numbers of larvae were high, tracer sheep probably underestimated the number being ingested. Increasing the numbers of tracer sheep from one to four did not appreciably increase the correspondence between the two methods.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4017(90)90068-m | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!