A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Differentiation of enamel lesion activity by vertical reflection intensity - a methodical description. | LitMetric

This article describes two objective, instrumental approaches for the distinction of enamel lesion activity - the in vitro measurement of surface layer porosity and surface roughness - and on this basis, the in vivo measurement of vertical reflection intensity (VRI). They are based on the subjective visual and tactile criteria of a dull and rough or a shiny and smooth surface, accepted by the known diagnostic systems, Nyvad criteria, International Caries Detection and Assessment System II, and Universal Visual Scoring System. With a scanning white-light interference microscope, the active lesion surface had a high porosity (118 pores) and a high roughness (Ra 190 nm) constituting a field of view of 280×210 μm. The inactive lesion surface had almost no porosity (one pore) and a more than 10-fold lower roughness (Ra 10 nm) for the same area. These differences result in a different light reflection of the lesion surfaces, which can be measured as VRI with a chromatic confocal sensor with spacer (mean VRI: active lesions, 7%; inactive lesions, 25%; sound enamel, 35%). In addition to monitoring, this sensor allows an in vivo handheld evaluation in a single (visit) examination.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2011-0030DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

enamel lesion
8
lesion activity
8
vertical reflection
8
reflection intensity
8
lesion surface
8
lesion
5
surface
5
differentiation enamel
4
activity vertical
4
intensity methodical
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!