Purposes: The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of straight laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy (sLRP) with ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis (UC).

Methods: Twenty patients underwent sLRP or open restorative proctocolectomy. The 2 groups were retrospectively well matched with respect to sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists' score.

Results: The median operative time was longer in the sLRP group (P=0.0003). The median operative blood loss was significantly less in the sLRP group (P=0.0054). The median analgesic drug usage during the first 7 days after surgery was lower in the sLRP group (P=0.038). There were no differences in morbidity rates and long-term functional outcome measures between the groups.

Conclusions: An sLRP for UC has the advantage over an open restorative proctocolectomy of better short-term outcomes, and both groups have similar long-term outcomes. This procedure is acceptable for minimally invasive surgery in patients with UC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182447a88DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

restorative proctocolectomy
16
slrp group
12
straight laparoscopic
8
laparoscopic restorative
8
ileal pouch
8
pouch anal
8
anal anastomosis
8
anastomosis ulcerative
8
ulcerative colitis
8
open restorative
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!