A common interest in gene expression data analysis is to identify from a large pool of candidate genes the genes that present significant changes in expression levels between a treatment and a control biological condition. Usually, it is done using a statistic value and a cutoff value that are used to separate the genes differentially and nondifferentially expressed. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian approach to identify genes differentially expressed calculating sequentially credibility intervals from predictive densities which are constructed using the sampled mean treatment effect from all genes in study excluding the treatment effect of genes previously identified with statistical evidence for difference. We compare our Bayesian approach with the standard ones based on the use of the t-test and modified t-tests via a simulation study, using small sample sizes which are common in gene expression data analysis. Results obtained report evidence that the proposed approach performs better than standard ones, especially for cases with mean differences and increases in treatment variance in relation to control variance. We also apply the methodologies to a well-known publicly available data set on Escherichia coli bacterium.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3306789 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/953086 | DOI Listing |
Neurosurg Rev
January 2025
Nanjing TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 157 Daming Road, Nanjing, Qinhuai District, 210022, China.
To systematically evaluate the differences in the clinical efficacy of lumbar degenerative disorders (LDDs) treatment between oblique lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OLIF-PF), OLIF stand-alone (OLIF-SA), and OLIF with anterolateral screw fixation (OLIF-AF). A systematic search was conducted on both English and Chinese databases, wherein the literature was screened based on title, abstract, and full text. Literature that met the inclusion criteria was assessed for quality and relevant information was extracted.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Epidemiol
January 2025
Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Am J Epidemiol
January 2025
New York State Department of Health, Office of Science and Technology, Albany, NY 10007, United States.
Indian J Crit Care Med
November 2024
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong.
Unlabelled: Adequately powered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the highest level of evidence in guiding clinical practice. Reports using Bayesian hypothesis-testing to reanalyze RCTs are increasing. One distinct advantage of Bayesian analysis is that we can obtain a range of numerical probabilities that reflect how likely a study intervention is more effective than the alternative after considering both pre-existing available evidence and the alternate hypotheses.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAppl Psychol Meas
January 2025
Educational Testing Service, NJ, USA.
This article suggests a new approach based on Bayesian decision theory (e.g., Cronbach & Gleser, 1965; Ferguson, 1967) for detection of test fraud.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!