Interposition arthroplasty with bioreplaceable poly-L-D-lactic acid (PLDLA) implants has yielded promising results in reconstruction of rheumatoid hands. In this prospective clinical study we compared the PLDLA implant arthroplasty (n = 17) with that of tendon interposition (n = 12) for destruction of the trapeziometacarpal joint in arthritic patients. There was no significant difference between the two groups preoperatively. At one-year follow-up, the mean pain and function scores were 5 and 13 in the PLDLA group, and 19 and 43 in the tendon interposition group, respectively. At one-year follow-up the visual analogue scale (VAS) for function of the PLDLA group differed significantly from that of the tendon interposition group (p = 0.03). This difference was not found at three months postoperatively, and disappeared again at two-year follow-up. Otherwise, no significant difference was found between the groups in the pain or function scores, functional tests, or range of movement. Bioreplaceable interposition arthroplasty works at least as well as tendon interposition. The operation is easier.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/2000656X.2012.669202DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tendon interposition
16
trapeziometacarpal joint
8
poly-l-d-lactic acid
8
prospective clinical
8
interposition arthroplasty
8
difference groups
8
one-year follow-up
8
pain function
8
function scores
8
pldla group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!