A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Intravascular infusion of lidocaine: a novel way to relieve sudden internal carotid artery occlusion in embolization of intracranial aneurysms. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study looks at a dangerous problem called vasospasm that can happen during a specific brain procedure known as embolization of aneurysms.
  • Doctors compared two treatments: one using a medicine called papaverine and another using lidocaine to see which one worked better.
  • Results showed that patients treated with lidocaine had a much better chance of improvement compared to those who received papaverine, making lidocaine a more effective option.

Article Abstract

Background: Sudden internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusive vasospasm is a serious complication of intracranial aneurysm embolization. Conventional spasmolysis with papaverine yields a generally poor outcome. We believe that arterial infusion of lidocaine may offer a better outcome.

Materials And Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of patients treated with either papaverine or lidocaine infusion for vasospasm during embolization.

Results: 14 patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm embolization had a ICA occlusive vasospasm. Among the 8 patients who received conventional treatment with papaverine the vasospasm improved partially in 5. In 3 cases, treatment was ineffective. 6 of the patients died within 3 days. 2 patients developed hemispheric infarction and underwent a decompressive craniectomy and subtotal resection of the infarct; 1 of these 2 patients died after 4 months and the other was severely disabled. In the 6 patients treated with lidocaine, spasmolysis and subsequent aneurysm treatment was successful in 5. In 1 patient who had preoperative stenosis of the carotid artery proximal to the aneurysm spasmolysis failed.

Conclusions: ICA occlusive spasm is an extremely serious and often lethal complication in embolization of intracranial aneurysms. Conventional treatment with papaverine has a poor outcome, whereas arterial infusion of lidocaine may achieve better results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1309063DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

infusion lidocaine
12
carotid artery
12
ica occlusive
12
sudden internal
8
internal carotid
8
embolization intracranial
8
intracranial aneurysms
8
occlusive vasospasm
8
intracranial aneurysm
8
aneurysm embolization
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!