A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Transcutaneous bilirubin measurement: comparison of Respironics BiliCheck and JM-103 in a normal newborn population. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compares the accuracy of two devices, BiliCheck™ and JM-103, for measuring total serum bilirubin (TSB) in 630 neonates.
  • While both devices show good correlation with TSB, BiliCheck™ tends to underestimate bilirubin levels more than JM-103.
  • JM-103 is cheaper and more efficient to use, suggesting it may be the preferred option, but further research is needed to assess its effectiveness for widespread screening of severe hyperbilirubinemia.

Article Abstract

Objectives: To compare the accuracy of BiliCheck™ (Respironics, Marietta, GA) and Konica-Minolta Air Shield JM-103 (Drager Medical Inc, Telford, PA) to evaluate total serum bilirubin (TSB).

Methods: Prospective blinded study comparing two diagnostic devices in 630 neonates requiring TSB measurement.

Results: Linear regression analysis showed a good correlation between BiliCheck™ and TSB (r=0.8212) as well as between JM-103 and TSB (r=0.8686). BiliCheck shows a tendency to underestimate TSB. The mean difference in TSB-TcB was -1.4 mg/dL for BC (-4.7/+1.8 mg/dL) and 0.3 mg/dL for JM-103 (-2.6/+3.2mg/dL). ROC analysis for TSB≥ 12 mg/dL showed area under the curve for BiliCheck™ significantly lower than those for JM-103 (p<0.0001). JM-103 resulted less time expensive than BiliCheck.

Conclusions: In spite of similar diagnostic accuracy JM-103 could be preferred for some practical advantages, but its suitability in performing universal screening for severe hyperbilirubinemia deserves further investigations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.03.014DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

jm-103
5
transcutaneous bilirubin
4
bilirubin measurement
4
measurement comparison
4
comparison respironics
4
respironics bilicheck
4
bilicheck jm-103
4
jm-103 normal
4
normal newborn
4
newborn population
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!