Objective: To evaluate the long-term oncological outcome of radical prostatectomy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
Methods: Among 378 patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy at our hospital, 189 had high-risk prostate cancer defined as presenting with at least one of the following high-risk factors: prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/ml, clinical T3 and biopsy Gleason score ≥8.
Results: The median follow-up was 8.1 years. Of all patients, 106 and 61 had one and two high-risk factors, respectively, and the remaining 22 had all three high-risk factors. Pathological examination of the prostatectomy specimens revealed organ-confined disease, specimen-confined disease and lymph node metastasis in 80 (42%), 102 (54%) and 22 (12%), respectively. The 10-year prostate-specific antigen failure-free and local progression-free survival rates were 48.5 and 87.6%, respectively. The 10-year cancer-specific and overall survival rates were 94.1 and 88.7%, respectively. The 10-year prostate-specific antigen failure-free survivals of patients with one, two and all three high-risk factors were 58.5, 39.9 and 22.7%, respectively (P = 0.0001). Of the 106 patients with one high-risk factor only, the high Gleason score group had the best 10-year prostate-specific antigen failure-free survival (69.1%); in particular, that of patients without Gleason grade 5 was 100% (P= 0.032).
Conclusions: Approximately half of patients with high-risk prostate cancer can be cured by radical prostatectomy without any adjuvant treatment. Radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer provides good long-term local cancer control and cancer-specific survival. In particular, radical prostatectomy for patients with only one high-risk factor can be considered a valuable therapeutic option as the first treatment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hys043 | DOI Listing |
Eur Urol Open Sci
January 2025
Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Background And Objective: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly being used to capture the patients' perspective of their functional status and quality of life (QoL). Big data can help us better understand patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Using prospectively collected data from the Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Enhancement Through the Power of Big Data in Europe (PIONEER) consortium, we aimed to describe the functional status and QoL in men with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with active surveillance (AS), radical prostatectomy (RP), and radiotherapy (RT), and to demonstrate the applicability of PROM data on a large scale and at a European level.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Urol Open Sci
January 2025
Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Background And Objective: In 2019 and 2021, Europa Uomo initiated the Europa Uomo Patient Reported Outcome Study (EUPROMS) and the EUPROMS 2.0 survey, with the goal of collecting data on patients' self-reported perspective on physical and mental well-being outside of a clinical trial setting, to be able to investigate the burden of prostate cancer (PCa) treatment from a patient-to-patient perspective. Acknowledging the importance of collecting quality of life (QoL) follow-up data, a 1-yr follow-up (1yrFU) study was conducted to assess the effect of additional PCa treatment on QoL.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDigit Health
January 2025
The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.
Background: The investigation of digital information sources and technologies specifically used by men with prostate cancer is scarce. This study seeks to address current gaps in the literature by investigating prostate cancer-specific internet and technology use by men with prostate cancer and factors associated with this use.
Methods: Cross-sectional surveys were conducted in three Australian urology clinics (local in Sydney, Western Sydney and Murrumbidgee) in 2023.
Int J Urol
January 2025
Department of Urology, Steve Biko Academic Hospital, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Background: Studies comparing oncological outcomes between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and open radical prostatectomy (ORP) are often limited by bias because of their multi-institutional and multiple surgeon design. Studies from a single institution and single surgeon are uncommon.
Objective: To compare oncological outcomes between RARP and ORP at a single institution by a single surgeon.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!