Aims: Right ventricular (RV) pacing has been shown to be potentially detrimental to left ventricular function. In conventional dual-chamber pacing the position of the atrial lead could influence duration of the atrio-ventricular (AV) intervals, which is one of the variables that could be associated with an increased percentage of RV pacing. We wanted to see if lead placement at selected atrial septal sites could reduce AV intervals in patients receiving a dual-chamber pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
Methods And Results: This was a prospective, acute, randomized single centre study that enrolled 57 patients. The atrial lead was placed in both the right atrial appendage (RAA) and the lower atrial septum (LAS) in each patient in random order. The P-wave durations, PR intervals, A sense-V sense (As-Vs), and A pace-V sense (Ap-Vs) intervals were measured at both atrial lead locations in each patient during device implant. The P-wave durations during sinus rhythm (SR), RAA pacing, and LAS pacing were 113 ± 19, 144 ± 27, and 84 ± 12 ms (RAA vs. LAS, P < 0.001), respectively. The PR intervals during SR, RAA pacing, and LAS pacing were 195 ± 47, 230 ± 61, and 167 ± 44 ms (RAA vs. LAS, P < 0.001), respectively. The As-Vs interval was 31% shorter in LAS pacing than in RAA pacing (134 ± 44 ms vs. 194 ± 52 ms, P < 0.001). The Ap-Vs interval was 24% shorter during LAS pacing than during RAA pacing (195 ± 45 ms vs. 257 ± 63 ms, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: When compared with RAA pacing, LAS pacing was associated with a shorter P wave duration, PR interval, As-Vs, and Ap-Vs intervals. The potential long-term impact of the strategy of pacing from LAS in reducing unnecessary RV pacing needs to be explored in future studies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eus043 | DOI Listing |
Heart Rhythm O2
November 2024
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Background: Traditional pacemaker implantation often poses risks, such as perforation when positioning atrial leads at the right atrial appendage (RAA). Recent advancements in delivery catheters have enabled atrial lead placement in the right atrial septum, potentially mitigating RAA-related complications. However, the performance of lumenless leads in this context remains unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRev Cardiovasc Med
November 2024
Cardiac Pacing and CIED Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100029 Beijing, China.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
November 2024
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Heart Rhythm O2
June 2024
Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Background: Traditional right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing accentuates conduction disturbances as opposed to Bachmann bundle pacing (BBP).
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of routine anatomically guided high right atrial septal (HRAS) pacing with activation of Bachmann bundle combined with routine left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP).
Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 96 consecutive patients who underwent 1 of 2 strategies: physiological pacing (PP) (n = 32) with HRAS and LBBAP leads and conventional pacing (CP) (n = 64) with traditional RAA and right ventricular apical leads.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol
August 2024
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan; College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan., Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Objective: This study evaluates the feasibility and efficacy of implanting a leadless pacemaker at the right atrial appendage (RAA) in a preclinical minipig model, aiming to address the limitations of atrial pacing with current leadless devices like the Medtronic Micra, which is typically used for right ventricular implantation.
Methods: Four minipigs, each with a median body weight of 45.8 ± 10.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!