Aims: Right ventricular (RV) pacing has been shown to be potentially detrimental to left ventricular function. In conventional dual-chamber pacing the position of the atrial lead could influence duration of the atrio-ventricular (AV) intervals, which is one of the variables that could be associated with an increased percentage of RV pacing. We wanted to see if lead placement at selected atrial septal sites could reduce AV intervals in patients receiving a dual-chamber pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Methods And Results: This was a prospective, acute, randomized single centre study that enrolled 57 patients. The atrial lead was placed in both the right atrial appendage (RAA) and the lower atrial septum (LAS) in each patient in random order. The P-wave durations, PR intervals, A sense-V sense (As-Vs), and A pace-V sense (Ap-Vs) intervals were measured at both atrial lead locations in each patient during device implant. The P-wave durations during sinus rhythm (SR), RAA pacing, and LAS pacing were 113 ± 19, 144 ± 27, and 84 ± 12 ms (RAA vs. LAS, P < 0.001), respectively. The PR intervals during SR, RAA pacing, and LAS pacing were 195 ± 47, 230 ± 61, and 167 ± 44 ms (RAA vs. LAS, P < 0.001), respectively. The As-Vs interval was 31% shorter in LAS pacing than in RAA pacing (134 ± 44 ms vs. 194 ± 52 ms, P < 0.001). The Ap-Vs interval was 24% shorter during LAS pacing than during RAA pacing (195 ± 45 ms vs. 257 ± 63 ms, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: When compared with RAA pacing, LAS pacing was associated with a shorter P wave duration, PR interval, As-Vs, and Ap-Vs intervals. The potential long-term impact of the strategy of pacing from LAS in reducing unnecessary RV pacing needs to be explored in future studies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eus043DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

raa pacing
20
las pacing
20
atrial lead
16
pacing
16
pacing las
16
las
9
atrial
8
lead placement
8
lower atrial
8
atrial septum
8

Similar Publications

Background: Traditional pacemaker implantation often poses risks, such as perforation when positioning atrial leads at the right atrial appendage (RAA). Recent advancements in delivery catheters have enabled atrial lead placement in the right atrial septum, potentially mitigating RAA-related complications. However, the performance of lumenless leads in this context remains unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a secure method for heart pacing, but past studies primarily evaluated left heart function without considering the right heart's impact, prompting this study to investigate various pacing methods on right heart metrics.
  • The study involved 90 patients with normal left ventricular function who were split into three groups: LBBAP, right ventricular septal pacing (RVSP), and right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP), examining various right heart indicators and interventricular synchrony.
  • Results showed no significant changes in the LBBAP group for several heart function metrics, whereas significant declines were noted in the RVAP group, suggesting varying impacts of different pacing locations on heart function.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Typical atrial flutter (AFL) is characterized by a macroreentrant tachycardia, specifically with electrocardiographic features like a negative sawtooth wave in inferior leads and a positive F wave in lead V1.
  • This study analyzed 10 patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation for AFL, using electroanatomical mapping to investigate the origins of the F wave changes during entrainment from the right atrial appendage (RAA).
  • Results showed that the positive F wave in lead V1 fluctuated with RAA entrainment, revealing an area of antidromic capture that collided with the orthodromic wave, confirming its role as the source of the F wave changes during typical AFL.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Traditional right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing accentuates conduction disturbances as opposed to Bachmann bundle pacing (BBP).

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of routine anatomically guided high right atrial septal (HRAS) pacing with activation of Bachmann bundle combined with routine left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP).

Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 96 consecutive patients who underwent 1 of 2 strategies: physiological pacing (PP) (n = 32) with HRAS and LBBAP leads and conventional pacing (CP) (n = 64) with traditional RAA and right ventricular apical leads.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Leadless pacemaker implementation at the right atrial appendage apex: An initial preclinical assessment.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

August 2024

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan; College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan., Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Objective: This study evaluates the feasibility and efficacy of implanting a leadless pacemaker at the right atrial appendage (RAA) in a preclinical minipig model, aiming to address the limitations of atrial pacing with current leadless devices like the Medtronic Micra, which is typically used for right ventricular implantation.

Methods: Four minipigs, each with a median body weight of 45.8 ± 10.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!