Objective: : The ideal graft material for pelvic reconstructive surgery remains undetermined. The purpose of this study was to present data on novel composite biologic/synthetic grafts during use in abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Methods: : A case series of 90 patients undergoing abdominal sacrocolpopexy with composite biologic/synthetic grafts was conducted. The primary outcome was graft erosion. Assuming a 3% risk of reoperation for mesh erosion, the number needed to treat with a composite graft in order to avoid erosion risk from a synthetic-only graft was calculated. The cost of a composite graft was compared to reoperation costs for mesh erosion of a synthetic-only graft.
Results: : Zero patients (N = 90) undergoing abdominal sacrocolpopexy with a composite biologic/synthetic graft experienced graft erosion. Based on existing data, thirty-three patients would need to be treated with a composite graft to avoid one mesh erosion from a synthetic-only graft. If a $500 composite graft is used, the cost of reoperation performed abdominally is higher.
Conclusions: : This study introduces a novel biologic/synthetic composite graft that offers the advantage of low erosion risk during use in abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Combined grafts may also be cost-effective. Future research should focus on exploring the role of these durable, yet low erosion risk grafts to potentially promote improved safety for our patients and cost savings for society.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0b013e3181f591bd | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!