Background: The interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer has arbitrarily been set at 6-8 weeks. However, tumor regression is variable. This study aimed to evaluate whether the interval between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery had an impact on pathologic response and on surgical and oncologic outcome.

Methods: A total of 356 consecutive patients with clinical stage II and III rectal adenocarcinoma were identified. Median age was 63 years, and 65 % were men. All patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (45 Gy) with a continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil. Data on neoadjuvant-surgery interval, type of surgery, pathology, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, disease recurrence, and survival were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the interval between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery: ≤ 7 weeks (short interval, n = 201) and >7 weeks (long interval, n = 155).

Results: The complete pathologic response rate was 21 %. It was significantly higher after a longer interval (28 %) than after a shorter interval (16 %, p = 0.006). A longer interval did not affect morbidity or length of hospital stay. After a median follow-up of 4.9 years, the 5-year cancer-specific survival rate was 83 % in the short-interval group versus 91 % in the long-interval group (p = 0.046), and the free-from-recurrence rate was 73 versus 83 %, respectively (p = 0.026).

Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, there seems to be an association between a longer interval after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and complete pathologic response without affecting postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay, and with no detrimental effect on oncologic outcome.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2327-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

interval neoadjuvant
20
neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
16
pathologic response
16
length hospital
12
hospital stay
12
longer interval
12
interval
10
rectal cancer
8
oncologic outcome
8
neoadjuvant therapy
8

Similar Publications

Background: Immunochemotherapy is inevitably accompanied with treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). However, TRAEs are typically assessed at a single time point, overlooking the complexity of TRAE trajectories over time. This study aimed to characterize TRAE trajectories during multi-cycle neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) and identify potential prognostic factors for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The optimal method for axillary staging in patients with initially node-positive breast cancer after NACT remains unclear.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center trial to investigate the diagnostic performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) combined with wire localized lymph node biopsy (WLNB) of the clip-marked node as an axillary staging technique in patients with node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

Results: A total of 233 patients were enrolled, 208 of whom were included in the analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The use of the residual cancer burden (RCB) for assessing breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is increasingly common, but the prognostic difference between RCB 0 and RCB I is unclear.

Methods: We systematically reviewed literature from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and oncology conferences until September 24, 2023. We used fixed- and random-effects models to calculate hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and distant disease-free survival (DDFS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate predictors of late biochemical recurrence in patients with no recurrence at 5 years after radical prostatectomy (RP).

Methods: We retrospectively investigated patients who underwent RP for prostate cancer in our institute from 1999 to 2016, selecting those with no biochemical recurrence at 5 years post-RP. These patients did not receive neoadjuvant and adjuvant hormone therapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

 Surgical procedures of curettage and surgical resection are used to treat giant cell tumor (GCT) of the distal radius, but it is still controversial whether one provides better functional outcomes than the other. The present study aims to determine and compare both procedures regarding complications, local recurrence, and mobility.  A complete search of the applicable literature was done and independently assessed by three authors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!