Objective: : This purpose of this consensus conference was to determine whether surgical atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation during cardiac surgery improves clinical and resource outcomes compared with cardiac surgery alone in adults undergoing cardiac surgery for valve or coronary artery bypass grafting.

Methods: : Before the consensus conference, the consensus panel reviewed the best available evidence, whereby systematic reviews, randomized trials, and nonrandomized trials were considered in descending order of validity and importance. Evidence-based statements were created, and consensus processes were used to determine the ensuing recommendations. The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology system was used to label the level of evidence and class of recommendation.

Results: : The consensus panel agreed on the following statements in patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery concomitant surgical ablation:

Conclusions: : Given these evidence-based statements, the consensus panel stated that, in patients with persistent and permanent AF undergoing cardiac surgery, concomitant surgical ablation is recommended to increase incidence of sinus rhythm at short- and long-term follow-up (class 1, level A); to reduce the risk of stroke and thromboembolic events (class 2a, level B); to improve EF (class 2a, level A); and to exercise tolerance (class 2a, level A) and long-term survival (class 2a, level B).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0b013e3181d72939DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cardiac surgery
24
class level
20
undergoing cardiac
12
consensus panel
12
surgical ablation
8
atrial fibrillation
8
consensus conference
8
evidence-based statements
8
surgery concomitant
8
concomitant surgical
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!