Comparing performance of three oscillating positive expiratory pressure devices at similar amplitude and frequencies of oscillations on displacement of mucus inside trachea during cough.

Background: Performance of Flutter® (Axcan Scandipharm Inc, Birmingham, AL), Acapella® (Smiths Medicals Inc, Rockland, MA) and Quake® (Thayer Medical, Tucson, AZ) were compared at similar frequencies and amplitudes of oscillations at nine angles of the device in clearing simulated mucus inside a tracheal model (trachea) oriented at three angles with or without simulated constrictions in airway upstream of trachea.

Methods: Displacement of 0.4mL of simulated mucus prepared with viscoelastic properties similar to healthy individuals (syrup-like) or patients with COPD (gel-like) using locust bean gum(LBG) solution (0.38g LBG in 100mL water) cross-linked with 3mL or 12mL borax solution (0.02 molar), respectively were measured inside trachea during coughs of 300ms at low cough velocity (15±0.5m/s) generated using a computer controlled solenoid valve. Oscillations were superimposed on cough by connecting the oscillator device to the outlet of the trachea.

Results: Frequency and amplitude of oscillations generated by Quake and Acapella and resulting mucus displacement were independent of angle of oscillator, while amplitude of oscillations and resulting mucus displacement generated by Flutter, increased up to 30o upward and 20o downward angles of Flutter from horizontal but decreased significantly thereafter. Displacement with Quake increased significantly with frequencies of oscillations up to 25 Hz and decreased thereafter but increased with amplitudes of oscillations up to 22±4.7 m/s. Quake showed significantly larger displacements than Flutter and Acapella at equal frequencies and amplitudes (p<0.05). Displacements were significantly larger with trachea positioned 30o upwards than horizontal or 20o downwards (p<0.0001). Displacement was the greatest for gel-like mucus than syrup-like (p<0.0001). Airway constrictions upstream resulted in enhanced displacement of mucus (p<0.0001).

Conclusions: Mucus clearance can be significantly enhanced by coughing through oscillating positive expiratory devices that generate high amplitude oscillations at moderate frequencies, increasing frontal depths of mucus facing airflow and slightly increasing resistance to airflow in airways in COPD patients.