The capital trial, by its nature, is fraught with emotionally disturbing elements that jurors must face when deciding the ultimate fate of a guilty defendant. A confluence of mitigating and aggravating factors influences a capital jury's decision to impose a sentence of death. The presence or absence of defendant remorse in these cases may make all the difference in whether a capital defendant's life is spared. This commentary examines the onerous emotional toll encountered by capital jurors in light of the findings of Corwin and colleagues regarding defendant remorse and juror's need for affect. The commentary also presents practical and ethics-related considerations that should be kept in mind when reflecting on their study.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

defendant remorse
8
commentary pursuing
4
pursuing justice
4
justice death
4
death penalty
4
penalty trials
4
capital
4
trials capital
4
capital trial
4
trial nature
4

Similar Publications

This magnetic resonance imaging study is designed to obtain relevant implications for criminal justice and explores the effective connectivity underlying expertise. Laypersons and experts considered sentences for remorseful and remorseless defendants, respectively, with and without mitigation, in hypothetical murder cases. Two groups revealed no differential activation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A Bayesian Account of Psychopathy: A Model of Lacks Remorse and Self-Aggrandizing.

Comput Psychiatr

October 2018

Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.

This article proposes a formal model that integrates cognitive and psychodynamic psychotherapeutic models of psychopathy to show how two major psychopathic traits called and can be understood as a form of abnormal Bayesian inference about the self. This model draws on the predictive coding (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

An Account of Earned Forgiveness through Apology.

Philosophia (Ramat Gan)

July 2017

Department of Philosophy, University of Sheffield, 45 Victoria Street, Sheffield, S3 7QB UK.

I start by presenting an intuitively appealing account of forgiveness, 'the insult account', which nicely explains the cycle from wrongdoing to forgiveness. We need to respond to wrongdoing by blaming our offenders because they insult us with their actions (Murphy 1988; Hieronymi (3), 529-55, 2001; Hampton 1988a, b). How can wrongdoing be overcome? Either by the retraction of the insult or by taking necessary steps to correct for the wrong done.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The role of remorse in judicial decisions in the criminal justice system has been addressed in scholarship and remains controversial. The purpose of this qualitative research was to examine the views of sitting criminal judges on remorse, its assessment, and its relevance in their decision-making. After approval of the study design by the institutional review board, 23 judges were interviewed in an open-ended format.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mental health evidence concerning antisocial and psychopathic traits appears to be introduced frequently in capital murder trials in the United States to argue that defendants are a "continuing threat" to society and thus worthy of execution. Using a simulation design, the present research examined how layperson perceptions of the psychopathic traits exhibited by a capital defendant would impact their attitudes about whether he should receive a death sentence. Across three studies (total N = 362), ratings of a defendant's perceived level of psychopathy strongly predicted support for executing him.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!