Purpose: Despite the recent innovations, complications of prostate biopsy can occur. The aim of this study was a prospective monitoring of major septic complications occurring after transrectal prostate biopsy, to describe their causing agents, to report the clinical course of these patients, and to give guidelines based on our personal experience.
Methods: This prospective study was carried out between January 2009 and September 2010. Complications were evaluated by telephone interviews.
Results: Between January 2009 and September 2010, 447 (96.5%) completed the telephone interview. Urosepsis occurred in ten patients (2.2%) and in three cases evolved into septic shock. Of these ten patients, nine had a positive blood culture, of whom eight for Escherichia coli and one for Aeromonas hydrophila, Aeromonas caviae, and Aeromonas sobria. In seven cases, the E. coli isolated were resistant to fluoroquinolone and six produced an extended spectrum beta-lactamase. Six E. coli were classified as multidrug-resistant organisms. Of the 10 patients, one died after the onset of multiorgan failure. For the other nine, the mean time spent in the hospital was 9 days (range, 6-15 days).
Conclusions: Escherichia coli are developing new drug resistances. Early recognition of patients who harbor MDRO E. coli in their rectum or in the urine could be an important strategy for preventing sepsis. If a patient who has recently undergone transrectal prostate biopsy shows clinical signs of sepsis in the 48 h, a multiresistant E. coli infection must be suspected. The patient must be admitted urgently to the hospital, and carbapenem antibiotic therapy should be started.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-012-0145-9 | DOI Listing |
Cancer Med
January 2025
Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Background: To assess how centralisation of cancer services via robotic surgery influenced positive surgical margin (PSM) occurrence and its associated risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in cases of pT2 prostate cancer (PC).
Methods: Retrospective analysis of all radical prostatectomy (RP) cases performed in the West of Scotland during the period from January 2013 to June 2022. Primary outcomes were PSM and BCR.
Genome Med
January 2025
Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Background: Despite extensive analysis, the dynamic changes in prostate epithelial cell states during tissue homeostasis as well as tumor initiation and progression have been poorly characterized. However, recent advances in single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology have greatly facilitated studies of cell states and plasticity in tissue maintenance and cancer, including in the prostate.
Methods: We have performed meta-analyses of new and previously published scRNA-seq datasets for mouse and human prostate tissues to identify and compare cell populations across datasets in a uniform manner.
EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem
January 2025
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, 751 23, Sweden.
Background: Gastrin releasing peptide receptor (GRPR)-directed radiopharmaceuticals for targeted radionuclide therapy may be a very promising addition in prostate and breast cancer patient management. Aiming to provide a GRPR-targeting theranostic pair, we have utilized the Tc-99m/Re-188 radiometal pair, in combination with two bombesin based antagonists, maSSS-PEG2-RM26 and maSES-PEG2-RM26. The two main aims of the current study were (i) to elucidate the influence of the radiometal-exchange on the biodistribution profile of the two peptides and (ii) to evaluate the feasibility of using the [Tc]Tc labeled counterparts for the dosimetry estimation for the [Re]Re-labeled conjugates.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAbdom Radiol (NY)
January 2025
University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
Purpose: We analyzed the additional value of systematic biopsy (SB) to MR-Ultrasound fusion biopsy (MRgFbx) for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), as increased sampling may cause increased morbidity.
Materials And Methods: This retrospective study cohort was comprised of 1229 biopsy sessions between July 2016 and May 2020 in men who had a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADSv2) category ≥ 3 lesion on 3 Tesla multiparametric MRI (3TmpMRI) and subsequent combined biopsy (CB; MRgFbx and SB) for suspected prostate cancer (PCa). Cancer detection rates (CDR) were calculated for CB, MRgFbx and SB in the study cohort and sub-cohorts stratified by biopsy history and PI-RADSv2 category.
Sci Rep
January 2025
Department of Nuclear Medicine, TUM University Hospital rechts der Isar, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted positron emission tomography (PET) has improved localization of prostate cancer (PC) lesions in biochemical recurrence (BCR) for salvage radiotherapy (SRT). We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing F-rhPSMA-7 or F-flotufolastat (F-rhPSMA-7.3)-PET-guided SRT compared with conventional-SRT (C-SRT) without PET.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!