Objective: : In 2007, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services mandated that kidney transplant programs establish a living donor advocate program to ensure safe care and support for living organ donors. This quality improvement project assessed the impact of establishing a living donor advocate program and identified the ethical commitments and threats living kidney donors perceive throughout the donation process.
Method: : This quality improvement project reflects a mixed-methods methodology. Qualitative as well as quantitative data were generated through the donor-advocate consultation sessions and the written Living Donor Satisfaction Survey. Thirteen living donors participated.
Results: : No threats to donor rights were identified by either the donor or the advocate. Nonrelated donors were motivated by altruism, whereas related donors were motivated by a sense of family. A majority of donors reported being changed emotionally and spiritually by the act of serving as a living donor. The living kidney donors were overwhelmingly extremely satisfied with their decision to donate and perceived the living donor advocacy program as being very good.
Discussion: : Questions have been raised about what role the donor's spouse should have during the informed consent process. Further research is needed to better understand the role and power of an advocate when threats to the donor's rights are noted.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NHL.0b013e318247689b | DOI Listing |
Sci Rep
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Several donor-specific factors influence the functional recovery and long-term outcomes of liver grafts. This study investigated the association between donor fasting glucose (DFG) and recipient outcomes after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in 950 cases at a single center. Patients were divided into two groups: low-DFG (< 85 mg/dL, n = 120) and control (≥ 85 mg/dL, n = 830).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Transplant
January 2025
Department of Surgery, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA.
Introduction: Some living organ donors will decide to donate again at a later date. Evidence has indicated that this practice may have increased in recent years. We evaluated the incidence and outcomes of this practice to inform counseling of potential repeat donors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Robot Surg
January 2025
Urological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Ole Maaloes Vej 24, 2. Floor, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) may reduce surgical complications compared to open kidney transplantation (OKT), but no randomised trials have explored this to date. The aim of the present study is to explore the feasibility of introducing RAKT at our institution, making it available in deceased donor transplantation and evaluate early surgical outcomes prior to performing a randomised trial comparing RAKT to OKT. RAKT was performed at Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Surg
January 2025
Liver Transplant Unit, Gastrointestinal Surgical Center (GISC), Surgery Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Dakahleyya, Egypt.
Background: In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), maintaining hepatic arterial flow is critical for graft survival. Alternative methods are required when the recipient's hepatic artery is unsuitable due to extensive dissection or inadequate flow. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of splenic artery transposition (SAT) for hepatic arterial reconstruction in LDLT.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIndian J Plast Surg
December 2024
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
A 21-year-old male laborer sustained bilateral degloving injury of the hands with multiple digital amputations and devascularized digits. After X-rays, preliminary debridement was done, when digital amputations were completed, including index ray amputation on both sides. The next day, two anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps and one second toe transfer were done to restore coverage in the palm and the web and reconstruct the lost thumb.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!