All clinicians take on leadership responsibilities when delivering care. Evidence suggests that effective clinical leadership yields superior clinical outcomes. However, few residency programs systematically teach all residents how to lead, and many clinicians are inadequately prepared to meet their day-to-day clinical leadership responsibilities. The purpose of this article is twofold: first, to make the case for the need to refocus residency education around the development of outstanding "frontline" clinical leaders and, second, to provide an evidence-based framework for designing formal leadership development programs for residents. The authors first present a definition of clinical leadership and highlight evidence that effective frontline clinical leadership improves both clinical outcomes and satisfaction for patients and providers. The authors then discuss the health care "leadership gap" and describe barriers to implementing leadership development training in health care. Next, they present evidence that leaders are not just "born" but, rather, can be "made," and offer a set of best practices to facilitate the design of leadership development programs. Finally, the authors suggest approaches to mitigating barriers to implementing leadership development programs and highlight the major reasons why health care delivery organizations, residency programs, and national accreditation bodies must make comprehensive leadership education an explicit goal of residency training.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31824a0c47DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

leadership development
20
clinical leadership
16
development programs
12
health care
12
leadership
11
development training
8
leadership responsibilities
8
care evidence
8
clinical outcomes
8
residency programs
8

Similar Publications

Sonographer Experiences of Interprofessional Ultrasound Education: A Qualitative Study.

J Contin Educ Health Prof

January 2025

Ms. Cormack: Adjunct Senior Lecturer, Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences Department, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, and PhD Candidate, Education Portfolio, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Australia.

Introduction: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) technology has evolved rapidly and is being embraced by many health professionals as a valuable clinical tool. Sonographers are now teaching ultrasound skills to other health professionals in the clinical setting, including doctors, nurses, midwives, paramedics, and physiotherapists. The purpose of this study was to understand the breadth of the opportunities, transitions, and challenges experienced by sonographer educators navigating new interprofessional teaching roles.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS®) is a strategy for improving communication and team climate in hospitals. While it shows promise, it remains an untested tool among health care professional teams. A cross-sectional design with survey methodology was implemented.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Dr. Sushila Nayar (1914-2001) was a pioneering figure in Indian public health whose work spanned from grassroots initiatives to national policy formation. This review article traces Dr.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

How do leaders' responses to the digital era affect new generation employees' affective commitment? As digital leaders have led to new ways of distributing digital resources and building virtual relationships, employees are facing a shift in the way of interaction, which influences their affective response to organizations. This study aims to understand how digital leaders interact with new generation employees to influence changes in employees' affective commitment to organizations. We have developed a chain mediating model and tested it on data collected from 408 new generation employees working in China.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: SPLASH (NCT04647526) is a multicenter phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of [Lu]Lu-PNT2002 radioligand therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study leveraged a lead-in phase to assess tissue dosimetry and evaluate preliminary safety and efficacy, prior to expansion into a randomized phase. Here we report those results.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!