Three-component cure rate model for nonproportional hazards alternative in the design of randomized clinical trials.

Clin Trials

Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

Published: April 2012

AI Article Synopsis

  • Cure rate models are crucial for analyzing time-to-event data in cancer trials, but traditional two-component exponential models may not capture the delayed treatment effects in some studies.
  • A phase III trial design for acute myeloid leukemia is proposed using a three-component exponential cure rate model, resulting in a necessary sample size of 409, which is larger than previous assumptions based on standard models.
  • It emphasizes the importance of accurately specifying the alternative hypothesis in trial design, as inaccuracies could lead to underpowered studies, addressed here by a slight sample size adjustment.

Article Abstract

Background: Cure rate models have been extensively studied and widely used in time-to-event data in cancer clinical trials.

Purpose: Although cure rate models based on the generalized exponential distribution have been developed, they have not been used in the design of randomized cancer clinical trials, which instead have relied exclusively on two-component exponential cure rate model with a proportional hazards (PH) alternative. In some studies, the efficacy of the experimental treatment is expected to emerge some time after randomization. Since this does not conform to a PH alternative, such studies require a more flexible model to describe the alternative hypothesis.

Methods: In this article, we report the study design of a phase III clinical trial of acute myeloid leukemia using a three-component exponential cure rate model to reflect the alternative hypothesis. A newly developed power calculation program that does not require PH assumption was used.

Results: Using a custom-made three-component cure rate model as an alternative hypothesis, the proposed sample size was 409, compared with a sample size of 209 under the assumption of exponential distribution and 228 under the PH alternative. A simulation study was performed to present the degree of power loss when the alternative hypothesis is not appropriately specified.

Limitations: The power calculation program used in this study is for a single analysis and does not account for group sequential tests in phase III trials. However, the loss in power is small, and this was handled by inflating the sample size by 5%.

Conclusion: Misspecification of the alternative hypothesis can result in a seriously underpowered study. We report examples of clinical trials that required a custom-made alternative hypothesis to reflect a later indication of experimental treatment efficacy. The proposed three-component cure rate model could be very useful for specifying non-PH alternative.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3707505PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1740774512436614DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cure rate
28
rate model
20
alternative hypothesis
20
three-component cure
12
clinical trials
12
sample size
12
alternative
11
hazards alternative
8
design randomized
8
rate models
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!