A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3145
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Repeat endorectal advancement flap after flap breakdown and recurrence of fistula-in-ano--is it an option? | LitMetric

Repeat endorectal advancement flap after flap breakdown and recurrence of fistula-in-ano--is it an option?

Colorectal Dis

Department of General Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Austria Department of Surgery, St John of God's Hospital Vienna, Austria.

Published: November 2012

Aim: Endorectal advancement flaps are an established treatment for high transsphincteric and suprasphincteric fistulae. The outcome of a repeat procedure in the case of flap breakdown and fistula recurrence remains unclear. The aim of the study was to analyse the outcome of repeat endorectal advancement flaps.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed patients with a repeat endorectal advancement flap procedure after flap breakdown and recurrence of fistula-in-ano of cryptoglandular origin who had been treated in our unit between 1994 and 2010.

Results: In all, 97 patients underwent an endorectal advancement flap procedure for fistula-in-ano and, of these, nine patients (five men, four women, 9.3%) subsequently underwent a repeat procedure due to flap breakdown. Median age was 40 years (range 25-60). Median follow-up time was 85 months (range 26-136). Seven full-thickness and two mucosal flap repeat procedures were performed because of eight transsphincteric and one suprasphincteric fistulae. The repeat procedure was successful in seven (78%) patients. In one of the two patients with repeat flap failure, a third flap procedure failed again. Disturbances of postoperative faecal incontinence were observed in five (55%) patients. Overall, the median postoperative Vaizey faecal incontinence score was 1 (range 0-4).

Conclusion: Repeat endorectal advancement flap procedures are feasible and associated with a low recurrence rate and mild postoperative faecal incontinence. Therefore, a repeat procedure is a viable option in the case of a flap breakdown and fistula recurrence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02990.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

endorectal advancement
24
flap breakdown
20
repeat endorectal
16
advancement flap
16
repeat procedure
16
flap
12
flap procedure
12
faecal incontinence
12
repeat
10
breakdown recurrence
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!