AI Article Synopsis

  • This study investigates how different adhesive bonding agents affect marginal sealing quality in class II amalgam restorations to address the issue of microleakage in restorative dentistry.
  • Forty human premolar and molar teeth were divided into four groups and treated with different adhesives or served as a control; after thermocycling and immersion in a dye solution, they were evaluated for microleakage.
  • Findings revealed that the PQ1 bonding agent provided the best sealing with the lowest microleakage, while the Amalgam Liner resulted in the highest levels of leakage.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Although advanced adhesive systems are in use, marginal microleakage is one of the greatest problems of contemporary restorative dentistry.

Objective: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of different bonding agents on the marginal sealing quality of class II amalgam restorations.

Methods: Forty freshly extracted human premolar and molar teeth were divided into four groups with 10 teeth in each one. Class II preparations were prepared and different adhesives were applied as follows: group I--Amalgam Liner (Voco); group II--ONE-STEP PLUS (Bisco); group III--PQ 1 (Ultradent). Group IV was used as a control, without any bonding agent. Amalgam (Cavex Non Gamma 2, Cavex) was hand-condensed into each preparation. Specimens were thermocycled 200 times at the following temperatures: 5-7 degrees C, 37 degrees C and 57-59 degrees C, and were then immersed into 1% solution of gentian violet for 72 hours. The teeth were sectioned longitudinally and microleakage was graded in the area of the gingival and occlusal quantity rim using a binocular magnifying glass with 25 times magnification.

Results: The highest microleakage was recorded in the Amalgam Liner group; 1526.0 microm at the gingival wall and 694.5 microm at the occlusal cavity wall. The lowest dye penetration was observed in the PQ1 group; 589.5 microm at the gingival wall, and 599.9 microm at the occlusal wall of the restoration. ANOVA test showed that there was a statistically significant difference of dye penetration values at the gingival wall among all examination groups (p < 0.01). No statistically significant differences were found comparing microleakage values at the occlusal wall.

Conclusion: Results of this study showed that the best marginal sealing was accomplished by using the PQ1 bonding agent.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/sarh1112722jDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

marginal sealing
12
gingival wall
12
bonding agents
8
agents marginal
8
sealing quality
8
bonding agent
8
microm gingival
8
microm occlusal
8
dye penetration
8
group
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!